Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 36-45 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | ENGLISH IN EDUCATION |
Volume | 53 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 27 Mar 2019 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 3 Dec 2018 |
E-pub ahead of print | 27 Mar 2019 |
Published | 2019 |
Additional links |
'Death by PEEL'_GIBBONS_Accepted3December2018_firstonline27March2019_GREEN AAM
_Death_by_PEEL_GIBBONS_Accepted1September2018_GREEN_AAM.pdf, 177 KB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:11 Oct 2018
Version:Accepted author manuscript
The teaching of writing is at the core of the secondary English teacher’s work. There have long been contrasting ideas about the most effective approaches to supporting students as writers, and in recent years in England the evidence—from Ofsted, for example—would suggest that it is common for teachers to offer structures to scaffold students’ writing in response to text, in particular. Whilst they may be helpful in some ways, there is a risk that these structures—often known by acronyms such as PEE (point, evidence, evaluation)—can be overused with a consequential marginalisation of student choice, voice and personal response. After a brief overview of the development of different approaches to teaching writing in English, this article—through consideration of a questionnaire and focus group interview—explores the teaching writing as it is experienced by one group of new entrants to the profession.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454