Deleuze, Guattari and the use of web-based corpora for facilitating critical analysis of public sphere arguments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article demonstrates a practical strategy for facilitating critical perspective on public sphere arguments. One issue for readers of an argument may be unfamiliarity with its topic. If this is the case, they may be unaware of the ‘other side’ of the argument. In the strategy that I put forward, the reader finds this out, gaining knowledge of key concerns across related groups which oppose the stance of the argument. This is achieved through corpus linguistic analysis of collections of texts from opposition websites. The results of these analyses allow the reader to judge the extent to which the argument addresses common oppositional concerns. As I show, this not only affords critical perspective on the argument but potentially problematising of it relative to these concerns. To assist me in developing this approach, I engage with some key ideas of the philosopher, Gilles Deleuze, and his collaborator, the psychoanalyst, Félix Guattari. To illustrate the critical strategy, I analyze an argument which is in favor of GM agriculture by drawing on corpora of texts from websites which oppose this form of agriculture.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-51
Number of pages12
JournalDiscourse, Context & Media
Volume2
Issue number1
Early online date16 Jan 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deleuze, Guattari and the use of web-based corpora for facilitating critical analysis of public sphere arguments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this