King's College London

Research portal

Delusions and responsibility for action: Insights from the Breivik case

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lisa Bortolotti, Matthew Broome, Matteo Mameli

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-382
Number of pages6
JournalNeuroethics
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 19 Dec 2013

King's Authors

Abstract

What factors should be taken into account when attributing criminal responsibility to perpetrators of severe crimes? We discuss the Breivik case, and the considerations which led to holding Breivik accountable for his criminal acts. We put some pressure on the view that experiencing certain psychiatric symptoms or receiving a certain psychiatric diagnosis is sufficient to establish criminal insanity. We also argue that the presence of delusional beliefs, often regarded as a key factor in determining responsibility, is neither necessary nor sufficient for criminal insanity.

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454