Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss

H Heath, S Cowley

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

388 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Novice qualitative researchers are often unsure regarding the analysis of their data and, where grounded theory is chosen, they may be uncertain regarding the differences that now exist between the approaches of Glaser and Strauss, who together first described the method. These two approaches are compared in relation to roots and divergences, role of induction, deduction and verification, ways in which data are coded and the format of generated theory. Personal experience of developing as a ground theorist is used to illustrate some of the key differences. A conclusion is drawn that. rather than debate relative merits of the two approaches, suggests that novice researchers need to select the method that best suits their cognitive style and develop analytic skills through doing research. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141 - 150
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this