Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score

Kate Quirke; Abdullatif Aydın; Matthew Bultitude; Kemal Sarıca; Jonathan Glass; Azhar Khan; Howard Marsh; Samih Al-Hayek; Oliver Wiseman; Jake Patterson; Jonathan Makanjuola; Andreas Skolarikos; Bhaskar Somani; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed

doi:10.1111/iju.14332

Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score

Kate Quirke, Abdullatif Aydın, Matthew Bultitude, Kemal Sarıca, Jonathan Glass, Azhar Khan, Howard Marsh, Samih Al-Hayek, Oliver Wiseman, Jake Patterson, Jonathan Makanjuola, Andreas Skolarikos, Bhaskar Somani, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Prokar Dasgupta, Kamran Ahmed^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and content validate a percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score, taking into consideration the procedure-specific risks. Methods: This prospective international study utilized the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to systematically outline percutaneous nephrolithotomy and failure modes for each step. A total of 25 h was spent observing percutaneous nephrolithotomy carried out by six expert surgeons. Hazard analysis scoring was carried out by 11 experts. It was determined if the steps were single point weaknesses. Single point weaknesses and those assigned a hazard score ≥4 were included in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool was then content validated by 16 experts from 10 countries. Results: Application of the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis identified 64 failure modes; 37 failure modes had a hazard score ≥4. After adaptations based on expert feedback the final percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score was developed containing 10 phases, 21 processes and 47 subprocesses. All participants agreed that the tool contained pertinent procedural steps. Conclusions: This study has developed and shown the international content validity of a novel percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool can be utilized in modular operating room training to quantify operator progress, and can be used in conjunction with other modules as part of a complete percutaneous nephrolithotomy curriculum for trainees.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	960-964
Number of pages	5
Journal	International Journal of Urology
Volume	27
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14332
Publication status	Published - Nov 2020

Keywords

assessment tool
checklist
healthcare failure mode
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
training

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1111/iju.14332

Cite this

Quirke, K., Aydın, A., Bultitude, M., Sarıca, K., Glass, J., Khan, A., Marsh, H., Al-Hayek, S., Wiseman, O., Patterson, J., Makanjuola, J., Skolarikos, A., Somani, B., Khan, M. S., Dasgupta, P., & Ahmed, K. (2020). Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. International Journal of Urology, 27(11), 960-964. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14332

@article{dd761bdba87543aca25229a07b3f6b2a,

title = "Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score",

abstract = "Objectives: To develop and content validate a percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score, taking into consideration the procedure-specific risks. Methods: This prospective international study utilized the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to systematically outline percutaneous nephrolithotomy and failure modes for each step. A total of 25 h was spent observing percutaneous nephrolithotomy carried out by six expert surgeons. Hazard analysis scoring was carried out by 11 experts. It was determined if the steps were single point weaknesses. Single point weaknesses and those assigned a hazard score ≥4 were included in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool was then content validated by 16 experts from 10 countries. Results: Application of the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis identified 64 failure modes; 37 failure modes had a hazard score ≥4. After adaptations based on expert feedback the final percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score was developed containing 10 phases, 21 processes and 47 subprocesses. All participants agreed that the tool contained pertinent procedural steps. Conclusions: This study has developed and shown the international content validity of a novel percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool can be utilized in modular operating room training to quantify operator progress, and can be used in conjunction with other modules as part of a complete percutaneous nephrolithotomy curriculum for trainees.",

keywords = "assessment tool, checklist, healthcare failure mode, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, training",

author = "Kate Quirke and Abdullatif Aydın and Matthew Bultitude and Kemal Sarıca and Jonathan Glass and Azhar Khan and Howard Marsh and Samih Al-Hayek and Oliver Wiseman and Jake Patterson and Jonathan Makanjuola and Andreas Skolarikos and Bhaskar Somani and Khan, {Muhammad Shamim} and Prokar Dasgupta and Kamran Ahmed",

year = "2020",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1111/iju.14332",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "960--964",

journal = "International Journal of Urology",

issn = "0919-8172",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "11",

}

Quirke, K, Aydın, A, Bultitude, M, Sarıca, K, Glass, J, Khan, A, Marsh, H, Al-Hayek, S, Wiseman, O, Patterson, J, Makanjuola, J, Skolarikos, A, Somani, B, Khan, MS , Dasgupta, P & Ahmed, K 2020, 'Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score', International Journal of Urology, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 960-964. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14332

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score

AU - Quirke, Kate

AU - Aydın, Abdullatif

AU - Bultitude, Matthew

AU - Sarıca, Kemal

AU - Glass, Jonathan

AU - Khan, Azhar

AU - Marsh, Howard

AU - Al-Hayek, Samih

AU - Wiseman, Oliver

AU - Patterson, Jake

AU - Makanjuola, Jonathan

AU - Skolarikos, Andreas

AU - Somani, Bhaskar

AU - Khan, Muhammad Shamim

AU - Dasgupta, Prokar

AU - Ahmed, Kamran

PY - 2020/11

Y1 - 2020/11

N2 - Objectives: To develop and content validate a percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score, taking into consideration the procedure-specific risks. Methods: This prospective international study utilized the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to systematically outline percutaneous nephrolithotomy and failure modes for each step. A total of 25 h was spent observing percutaneous nephrolithotomy carried out by six expert surgeons. Hazard analysis scoring was carried out by 11 experts. It was determined if the steps were single point weaknesses. Single point weaknesses and those assigned a hazard score ≥4 were included in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool was then content validated by 16 experts from 10 countries. Results: Application of the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis identified 64 failure modes; 37 failure modes had a hazard score ≥4. After adaptations based on expert feedback the final percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score was developed containing 10 phases, 21 processes and 47 subprocesses. All participants agreed that the tool contained pertinent procedural steps. Conclusions: This study has developed and shown the international content validity of a novel percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool can be utilized in modular operating room training to quantify operator progress, and can be used in conjunction with other modules as part of a complete percutaneous nephrolithotomy curriculum for trainees.

AB - Objectives: To develop and content validate a percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score, taking into consideration the procedure-specific risks. Methods: This prospective international study utilized the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to systematically outline percutaneous nephrolithotomy and failure modes for each step. A total of 25 h was spent observing percutaneous nephrolithotomy carried out by six expert surgeons. Hazard analysis scoring was carried out by 11 experts. It was determined if the steps were single point weaknesses. Single point weaknesses and those assigned a hazard score ≥4 were included in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool was then content validated by 16 experts from 10 countries. Results: Application of the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis identified 64 failure modes; 37 failure modes had a hazard score ≥4. After adaptations based on expert feedback the final percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score was developed containing 10 phases, 21 processes and 47 subprocesses. All participants agreed that the tool contained pertinent procedural steps. Conclusions: This study has developed and shown the international content validity of a novel percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool can be utilized in modular operating room training to quantify operator progress, and can be used in conjunction with other modules as part of a complete percutaneous nephrolithotomy curriculum for trainees.

KW - assessment tool

KW - checklist

KW - healthcare failure mode

KW - percutaneous nephrolithotomy

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089015291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/iju.14332

DO - 10.1111/iju.14332

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85089015291

SN - 0919-8172

VL - 27

SP - 960

EP - 964

JO - International Journal of Urology

JF - International Journal of Urology

IS - 11

ER -

Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this