King's College London

Research portal

Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. / Quirke, Kate; Aydın, Abdullatif; Bultitude, Matthew; Sarıca, Kemal; Glass, Jonathan; Khan, Azhar; Marsh, Howard; Al-Hayek, Samih; Wiseman, Oliver; Patterson, Jake; Makanjuola, Jonathan; Skolarikos, Andreas; Somani, Bhaskar; Khan, Muhammad Shamim; Dasgupta, Prokar; Ahmed, Kamran.

In: International Journal of Urology, Vol. 27, No. 11, 11.2020, p. 960-964.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Quirke, K, Aydın, A, Bultitude, M, Sarıca, K, Glass, J, Khan, A, Marsh, H, Al-Hayek, S, Wiseman, O, Patterson, J, Makanjuola, J, Skolarikos, A, Somani, B, Khan, MS, Dasgupta, P & Ahmed, K 2020, 'Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score', International Journal of Urology, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 960-964. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14332

APA

Quirke, K., Aydın, A., Bultitude, M., Sarıca, K., Glass, J., Khan, A., Marsh, H., Al-Hayek, S., Wiseman, O., Patterson, J., Makanjuola, J., Skolarikos, A., Somani, B., Khan, M. S., Dasgupta, P., & Ahmed, K. (2020). Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. International Journal of Urology, 27(11), 960-964. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14332

Vancouver

Quirke K, Aydın A, Bultitude M, Sarıca K, Glass J, Khan A et al. Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. International Journal of Urology. 2020 Nov;27(11):960-964. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14332

Author

Quirke, Kate ; Aydın, Abdullatif ; Bultitude, Matthew ; Sarıca, Kemal ; Glass, Jonathan ; Khan, Azhar ; Marsh, Howard ; Al-Hayek, Samih ; Wiseman, Oliver ; Patterson, Jake ; Makanjuola, Jonathan ; Skolarikos, Andreas ; Somani, Bhaskar ; Khan, Muhammad Shamim ; Dasgupta, Prokar ; Ahmed, Kamran. / Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. In: International Journal of Urology. 2020 ; Vol. 27, No. 11. pp. 960-964.

Bibtex Download

@article{dd761bdba87543aca25229a07b3f6b2a,
title = "Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score",
abstract = "Objectives: To develop and content validate a percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score, taking into consideration the procedure-specific risks. Methods: This prospective international study utilized the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to systematically outline percutaneous nephrolithotomy and failure modes for each step. A total of 25 h was spent observing percutaneous nephrolithotomy carried out by six expert surgeons. Hazard analysis scoring was carried out by 11 experts. It was determined if the steps were single point weaknesses. Single point weaknesses and those assigned a hazard score ≥4 were included in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool was then content validated by 16 experts from 10 countries. Results: Application of the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis identified 64 failure modes; 37 failure modes had a hazard score ≥4. After adaptations based on expert feedback the final percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score was developed containing 10 phases, 21 processes and 47 subprocesses. All participants agreed that the tool contained pertinent procedural steps. Conclusions: This study has developed and shown the international content validity of a novel percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool can be utilized in modular operating room training to quantify operator progress, and can be used in conjunction with other modules as part of a complete percutaneous nephrolithotomy curriculum for trainees.",
keywords = "assessment tool, checklist, healthcare failure mode, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, training",
author = "Kate Quirke and Abdullatif Aydın and Matthew Bultitude and Kemal Sarıca and Jonathan Glass and Azhar Khan and Howard Marsh and Samih Al-Hayek and Oliver Wiseman and Jake Patterson and Jonathan Makanjuola and Andreas Skolarikos and Bhaskar Somani and Khan, {Muhammad Shamim} and Prokar Dasgupta and Kamran Ahmed",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/iju.14332",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "960--964",
journal = "International Journal of Urology",
issn = "0919-8172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and content validation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score

AU - Quirke, Kate

AU - Aydın, Abdullatif

AU - Bultitude, Matthew

AU - Sarıca, Kemal

AU - Glass, Jonathan

AU - Khan, Azhar

AU - Marsh, Howard

AU - Al-Hayek, Samih

AU - Wiseman, Oliver

AU - Patterson, Jake

AU - Makanjuola, Jonathan

AU - Skolarikos, Andreas

AU - Somani, Bhaskar

AU - Khan, Muhammad Shamim

AU - Dasgupta, Prokar

AU - Ahmed, Kamran

PY - 2020/11

Y1 - 2020/11

N2 - Objectives: To develop and content validate a percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score, taking into consideration the procedure-specific risks. Methods: This prospective international study utilized the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to systematically outline percutaneous nephrolithotomy and failure modes for each step. A total of 25 h was spent observing percutaneous nephrolithotomy carried out by six expert surgeons. Hazard analysis scoring was carried out by 11 experts. It was determined if the steps were single point weaknesses. Single point weaknesses and those assigned a hazard score ≥4 were included in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool was then content validated by 16 experts from 10 countries. Results: Application of the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis identified 64 failure modes; 37 failure modes had a hazard score ≥4. After adaptations based on expert feedback the final percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score was developed containing 10 phases, 21 processes and 47 subprocesses. All participants agreed that the tool contained pertinent procedural steps. Conclusions: This study has developed and shown the international content validity of a novel percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool can be utilized in modular operating room training to quantify operator progress, and can be used in conjunction with other modules as part of a complete percutaneous nephrolithotomy curriculum for trainees.

AB - Objectives: To develop and content validate a percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score, taking into consideration the procedure-specific risks. Methods: This prospective international study utilized the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to systematically outline percutaneous nephrolithotomy and failure modes for each step. A total of 25 h was spent observing percutaneous nephrolithotomy carried out by six expert surgeons. Hazard analysis scoring was carried out by 11 experts. It was determined if the steps were single point weaknesses. Single point weaknesses and those assigned a hazard score ≥4 were included in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool was then content validated by 16 experts from 10 countries. Results: Application of the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis identified 64 failure modes; 37 failure modes had a hazard score ≥4. After adaptations based on expert feedback the final percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score was developed containing 10 phases, 21 processes and 47 subprocesses. All participants agreed that the tool contained pertinent procedural steps. Conclusions: This study has developed and shown the international content validity of a novel percutaneous nephrolithotomy assessment score. The tool can be utilized in modular operating room training to quantify operator progress, and can be used in conjunction with other modules as part of a complete percutaneous nephrolithotomy curriculum for trainees.

KW - assessment tool

KW - checklist

KW - healthcare failure mode

KW - percutaneous nephrolithotomy

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089015291&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/iju.14332

DO - 10.1111/iju.14332

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85089015291

VL - 27

SP - 960

EP - 964

JO - International Journal of Urology

JF - International Journal of Urology

SN - 0919-8172

IS - 11

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454