Development and evaluation of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and evaluation of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery

AU - Williams, Julie

AU - Leamy, Mary

AU - Bird, Victoria

AU - Le Boutillier, Clair

AU - Norton, Sam

AU - Pesola, Francesca

AU - Slade, Mike

PY - 2015/5

Y1 - 2015/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: No individualised standardised measure of staff support for mental health recovery exists.AIMS: To develop and evaluate a measure of staff support for recovery.METHOD: Development: initial draft of measure based on systematic review of recovery processes; consultation (n = 61); and piloting (n = 20). Psychometric evaluation: three rounds of data collection from mental health service users (n = 92).RESULTS: INSPIRE has two sub-scales. The 20-item Support sub-scale has convergent validity (0.60) and adequate sensitivity to change. Exploratory factor analysis (variance 71.4-85.1 %, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.65-0.78) and internal consistency (range 0.82-0.85) indicate each recovery domain is adequately assessed. The 7-item Relationship sub-scale has convergent validity 0.69, test-retest reliability 0.75, internal consistency 0.89, a one-factor solution (variance 70.5 %, KMO 0.84) and adequate sensitivity to change. A 5-item Brief INSPIRE was also evaluated.CONCLUSIONS: INSPIRE and Brief INSPIRE demonstrate adequate psychometric properties, and can be recommended for research and clinical use.

AB - BACKGROUND: No individualised standardised measure of staff support for mental health recovery exists.AIMS: To develop and evaluate a measure of staff support for recovery.METHOD: Development: initial draft of measure based on systematic review of recovery processes; consultation (n = 61); and piloting (n = 20). Psychometric evaluation: three rounds of data collection from mental health service users (n = 92).RESULTS: INSPIRE has two sub-scales. The 20-item Support sub-scale has convergent validity (0.60) and adequate sensitivity to change. Exploratory factor analysis (variance 71.4-85.1 %, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.65-0.78) and internal consistency (range 0.82-0.85) indicate each recovery domain is adequately assessed. The 7-item Relationship sub-scale has convergent validity 0.69, test-retest reliability 0.75, internal consistency 0.89, a one-factor solution (variance 70.5 %, KMO 0.84) and adequate sensitivity to change. A 5-item Brief INSPIRE was also evaluated.CONCLUSIONS: INSPIRE and Brief INSPIRE demonstrate adequate psychometric properties, and can be recommended for research and clinical use.

U2 - 10.1007/s00127-014-0983-0

DO - 10.1007/s00127-014-0983-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 25409867

SN - 0933-7954

VL - 50

SP - 777

EP - 786

JO - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

JF - Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

IS - 5

ER -