Development and testing of new candidate psoriatic arthritis screening questionnaires combining optimal questions from existing tools

Laura C Coates, Jessica Walsh, Muhammad Haroon, Oliver FitzGerald, Tariq Aslam, Farida Al Balushi, A D Burden, Esther Burden-Teh, Anna R Caperon, Rino Cerio, Chandrabhusan Chattopadhyay, Hector Chinoy, Mark J D Goodfield, Lesley Kay, Stephen Kelly, Bruce W Kirkham, Christopher R Lovell, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Neil McHugh, Ruth MurphyNick J Reynolds, Catherine H Smith, Elizabeth J C Stewart, Richard B Warren, Robin Waxman, Hilary E Wilson, Philip S Helliwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several questionnaires have been developed to screen for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but head-to-head studies have found limitations. This study aimed to develop new questionnaires encompassing the most discriminative questions from existing instruments.

METHODS: Data from the CONTEST study, a head-to-head comparison of 3 existing questionnaires, were used to identify items with a Youden index score of ≥0.1. These were combined using 4 approaches: CONTEST (simple additions of questions), CONTESTw (weighting using logistic regression), CONTESTjt (addition of a joint manikin), and CONTESTtree (additional questions identified by classification and regression tree [CART] analysis). These candidate questionnaires were tested in independent data sets.

RESULTS: Twelve individual questions with a Youden index score of ≥0.1 were identified, but 4 of these were excluded due to duplication and redundancy. Weighting for 2 of these questions was included in CONTESTw. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that involvement in 6 joint areas on the manikin was predictive of PsA for inclusion in CONTESTjt. CART analysis identified a further 5 questions for inclusion in CONTESTtree. CONTESTtree was not significant on ROC curve analysis and discarded. The other 3 questionnaires were significant in all data sets, although CONTESTw was slightly inferior to the others in the validation data sets. Potential cut points for referral were also discussed.

CONCLUSION: Of 4 candidate questionnaires combining existing discriminatory items to identify PsA in people with psoriasis, 3 were found to be significant on ROC curve analysis. Testing in independent data sets identified 2 questionnaires (CONTEST and CONTESTjt) that should be pursued for further prospective testing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1410-6
Number of pages7
JournalArthritis care & research
Volume66
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2014

Keywords

  • Arthritis, Psoriatic
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and testing of new candidate psoriatic arthritis screening questionnaires combining optimal questions from existing tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this