TY - JOUR
T1 - Differences between human and mouse igm fc receptor (Fcμr)
AU - Kubagawa, Hiromi
AU - Skopnik, Christopher M.
AU - Al‐qaisi, Khlowd
AU - Calvert, Rosaleen A.
AU - Honjo, Kazuhito
AU - Kubagawa, Yoshiki
AU - Teuber, Ruth
AU - Aliabadi, Pedram Mahmoudi
AU - Enghard, Philipp
AU - Radbruch, Andreas
AU - Sutton, Brian J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: Funded by the Deutsches Rheuma‐Forschungszentrum Institutional funds (to H.K.) and BBSRC Project Grant (BB/K006142/1) (to B.J.S.)
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - Both non‐immune “natural” and antigen‐induced “immune” IgM are important for protection against pathogens and for regulation of immune responses to self‐antigens. Since the bona fide IgM Fc receptor (FcμR) was identified in humans by a functional cloning strategy in 2009, the roles of FcμR in these IgM effector functions have begun to be explored. In this short essay, we describe the differences between human and mouse FcμRs in terms of their identification processes, cellular distributions and ligand binding activities with emphasis on our recent findings from the mutational analysis of human FcμR. We have identified at least three sites of human FcμR, i.e., Asn66 in the CDR2, Lys79 to Arg83 in the DE loop and Asn109 in the CDR3, responsible for its constitutive IgM‐ligand binding. Results of computational structural modeling analysis are consistent with these mutational data and a model of the ligand binding, Ig‐like domain of human FcμR is proposed. Serendipitously, substitution of Glu41 and Met42 in the CDR1 of human FcμR with mouse equivalents Gln and Leu, either single or more prominently in combination, enhances both the receptor expression and IgM binding. These findings would help in the future development of preventive and therapeutic interventions targeting FcμR.
AB - Both non‐immune “natural” and antigen‐induced “immune” IgM are important for protection against pathogens and for regulation of immune responses to self‐antigens. Since the bona fide IgM Fc receptor (FcμR) was identified in humans by a functional cloning strategy in 2009, the roles of FcμR in these IgM effector functions have begun to be explored. In this short essay, we describe the differences between human and mouse FcμRs in terms of their identification processes, cellular distributions and ligand binding activities with emphasis on our recent findings from the mutational analysis of human FcμR. We have identified at least three sites of human FcμR, i.e., Asn66 in the CDR2, Lys79 to Arg83 in the DE loop and Asn109 in the CDR3, responsible for its constitutive IgM‐ligand binding. Results of computational structural modeling analysis are consistent with these mutational data and a model of the ligand binding, Ig‐like domain of human FcμR is proposed. Serendipitously, substitution of Glu41 and Met42 in the CDR1 of human FcμR with mouse equivalents Gln and Leu, either single or more prominently in combination, enhances both the receptor expression and IgM binding. These findings would help in the future development of preventive and therapeutic interventions targeting FcμR.
KW - 3D structure
KW - Computational structural model
KW - FcR
KW - Fcα/μR
KW - FcμR
KW - IgM binding
KW - PIgR
KW - Species difference
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108789600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijms22137024
DO - 10.3390/ijms22137024
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85108789600
SN - 1661-6596
VL - 22
JO - International Journal of Molecular Sciences
JF - International Journal of Molecular Sciences
IS - 13
M1 - 7024
ER -