Digital health tools for the passive monitoring of depression: a systematic review of methods

Valeria De Angel*, Serena Lewis, Katie White, Carolin Oetzmann, Daniel Leightley, Emanuela Oprea, Grace Lavelle, Faith Matcham, Alice Pace, David C. Mohr, Richard Dobson, Matthew Hotopf

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Citations (Scopus)
180 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of digital tools to measure physiological and behavioural variables of potential relevance to mental health is a growing field sitting at the intersection between computer science, engineering, and clinical science. We summarised the literature on remote measuring technologies, mapping methodological challenges and threats to reproducibility, and identified leading digital signals for depression. Medical and computer science databases were searched between January 2007 and November 2019. Published studies linking depression and objective behavioural data obtained from smartphone and wearable device sensors in adults with unipolar depression and healthy subjects were included. A descriptive approach was taken to synthesise study methodologies. We included 51 studies and found threats to reproducibility and transparency arising from failure to provide comprehensive descriptions of recruitment strategies, sample information, feature construction and the determination and handling of missing data. The literature is characterised by small sample sizes, short follow-up duration and great variability in the quality of reporting, limiting the interpretability of pooled results. Bivariate analyses show consistency in statistically significant associations between depression and digital features from sleep, physical activity, location, and phone use data. Machine learning models found the predictive value of aggregated features. Given the pitfalls in the combined literature, these results should be taken purely as a starting point for hypothesis generation. Since this research is ultimately aimed at informing clinical practice, we recommend improvements in reporting standards including consideration of generalisability and reproducibility, such as wider diversity of samples, thorough reporting methodology and the reporting of potential bias in studies with numerous features.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3
Number of pages14
Journalnpj Digital Medicine
Volume5
Issue number1
Early online date11 Jan 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jan 2022

Keywords

  • Review Article
  • /631/477/2811
  • /692/308/53/2421
  • /631/114/1305
  • review-article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Digital health tools for the passive monitoring of depression: a systematic review of methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this