Direct Oral Anticoagulants Use in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Are These Drugs an Effective and Safe Alternative to Warfarin? A Systematic Review of the Literature: Comment

Hannah Cohen*, Beverley J. Hunt, Maria Efthymiou, Ian J. Mackie, Munther Khamashta, David A. Isenberg, RAPS Trial Investigators

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
160 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We respond to comments by Dufrost et al. about the RAPS trial, in particular, showing that the trial did achieve its target sample size; pointing out that thrombin potential is not synonymous with overall thrombin generation; confirming that overall, no increased thrombotic risk was evident comparing rivaroxaban with warfarin; and that high-risk patients (28% were triple positive, representative of patients with venous thromboembolism requiring standard-intensity anticoagulation) were included; and clarifying our rationale for using a laboratory surrogate primary outcome measure instead of a clinical one.

Original languageEnglish
Article number50
JournalCurrent Rheumatology Reports
Volume19
Issue number8
Early online date20 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Keywords

  • Antiphospholipid syndrome
  • Rivaroxaban
  • Thrombin generation
  • Venous thromboembolism
  • Warfarin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct Oral Anticoagulants Use in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Are These Drugs an Effective and Safe Alternative to Warfarin? A Systematic Review of the Literature: Comment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this