Abstract
We respond to comments by Dufrost et al. about the RAPS trial, in particular, showing that the trial did achieve its target sample size; pointing out that thrombin potential is not synonymous with overall thrombin generation; confirming that overall, no increased thrombotic risk was evident comparing rivaroxaban with warfarin; and that high-risk patients (28% were triple positive, representative of patients with venous thromboembolism requiring standard-intensity anticoagulation) were included; and clarifying our rationale for using a laboratory surrogate primary outcome measure instead of a clinical one.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 50 |
Journal | Current Rheumatology Reports |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 20 Jul 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2017 |
Keywords
- Antiphospholipid syndrome
- Rivaroxaban
- Thrombin generation
- Venous thromboembolism
- Warfarin