TY - JOUR
T1 - Diuretic dose trajectories in dilated cardiomyopathy
T2 - prognostic implications
AU - Nuzzi, Vincenzo
AU - Cannatà, Antonio
AU - Pellicori, Pierpaolo
AU - Manca, Paolo
AU - Stolfo, Davide
AU - Gregorio, Caterina
AU - Barbati, Giulia
AU - Bromage, Daniel I.
AU - McDonagh, Theresa
AU - Cleland, John G.F.
AU - Merlo, Marco
AU - Sinagra, Gianfranco
N1 - Funding Information:
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Trieste within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/11/17
Y1 - 2022/11/17
N2 - Background: For patients with heart failure, prescription of loop diuretics (LD) and of higher doses are associated with an adverse prognosis. We investigated LD dose trajectories and their associations with outcomes in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Methods: Associations between outcomes and both furosemide-equivalent dose (FED) at enrolment and change in FED in the subsequent 24 months were evaluated. According to FED trajectory, patients were classified as (i) dose↑ (FED increase by ≥ 50% or newly initiated); (ii) dose↓ (FED decrease by ≥ 50%); (iii) stable dose (change in FED by < 50%); and (iv) never-users. The primary outcome was all-cause-death/heart transplantation/ventricular-assist-device/heart failure hospitalization. The secondary outcome was all-cause-death/heart transplantation/ventricular-assist-device. Results: Of 1,131 patients enrolled, 738 (65%) were prescribed LD at baseline. Baseline FED was independently associated with outcome (HR per 20 mg increase: 1.12 [95% CI 1.04–1.22], p = 0.003).Of the 908 with information on FED within 24 months from enrolment, 31% were never-users; 29% were dose↓; 26% were stable dose and 14% were dose↑. In adjusted models, compared to never-users, stable dose had a higher risk of the primary outcome (HR 2.42 [95% CI 1.19–4.93], p = 0.015), while dose↑ had the worst prognosis (HR 2.76 [95% CI 1.27–6.03], p = 0.011). Results were similar for the secondary outcome. Compared to patients who remained on LD, discontinuation of LD (143, 24%) was associated with an improved outcome (HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.28–0.65], p < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with DCM, LD use and increasing FED are powerful markers of adverse outcomes. Patients who never receive LD have an excellent prognosis. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
AB - Background: For patients with heart failure, prescription of loop diuretics (LD) and of higher doses are associated with an adverse prognosis. We investigated LD dose trajectories and their associations with outcomes in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Methods: Associations between outcomes and both furosemide-equivalent dose (FED) at enrolment and change in FED in the subsequent 24 months were evaluated. According to FED trajectory, patients were classified as (i) dose↑ (FED increase by ≥ 50% or newly initiated); (ii) dose↓ (FED decrease by ≥ 50%); (iii) stable dose (change in FED by < 50%); and (iv) never-users. The primary outcome was all-cause-death/heart transplantation/ventricular-assist-device/heart failure hospitalization. The secondary outcome was all-cause-death/heart transplantation/ventricular-assist-device. Results: Of 1,131 patients enrolled, 738 (65%) were prescribed LD at baseline. Baseline FED was independently associated with outcome (HR per 20 mg increase: 1.12 [95% CI 1.04–1.22], p = 0.003).Of the 908 with information on FED within 24 months from enrolment, 31% were never-users; 29% were dose↓; 26% were stable dose and 14% were dose↑. In adjusted models, compared to never-users, stable dose had a higher risk of the primary outcome (HR 2.42 [95% CI 1.19–4.93], p = 0.015), while dose↑ had the worst prognosis (HR 2.76 [95% CI 1.27–6.03], p = 0.011). Results were similar for the secondary outcome. Compared to patients who remained on LD, discontinuation of LD (143, 24%) was associated with an improved outcome (HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.28–0.65], p < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with DCM, LD use and increasing FED are powerful markers of adverse outcomes. Patients who never receive LD have an excellent prognosis. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
KW - Dilated cardiomyopathy
KW - Heart failure
KW - Long-term trajectories
KW - Loop diuretics
KW - Prognostic associations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141966558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00392-022-02126-8
DO - 10.1007/s00392-022-02126-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 36385396
AN - SCOPUS:85141966558
SN - 1861-0684
VL - 112
SP - 419
EP - 430
JO - Clinical Research in Cardiology
JF - Clinical Research in Cardiology
IS - 3
ER -