Does It Help to Call a Spade a Spade? Examining the Legal Bases and Effects of Rule of Law-Related Infringement Procedures Against Hungary

Lisa Anders, Sonja Priebus

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Whether infringement procedures are suitable to enforce the EU’s foundational values is contested. According to critics, they lead to a miscategorisation of the problems because rule of law concerns are reframed as concrete EU law violations. Others see infringement procedures as a powerful alternative to the Article 7 procedure, stressing their potential to depoliticise rule of law-related conflicts. As we still lack systematic studies on the deployment and effects of infringement procedures in rule of law related cases, this chapter analyses all seven procedures with rule of law relevance launched against Hungary since 2010. It analyses whether the Commission indeed miscategorised the cases and how the Hungarian government reacted legally and rhetorically. The findings cast doubt on the premises that the procedures depoliticise the conflicts and that the correct categorisation of rule of law problems could induce compliance with the EU’s foundational values.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication Illiberal Trends and Anti-EU Politics in East Central Europe
EditorsAstrid Lorenz, Lisa Anders
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages 235-262
Volume1
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-030-54674-8
ISBN (Print)978-3-030-54676-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Oct 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does It Help to Call a Spade a Spade? Examining the Legal Bases and Effects of Rule of Law-Related Infringement Procedures Against Hungary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this