Abstract
Objective:
To determine whether timing of deinfibulation influences obstetric outcomes for women with type 3 female genital mutilation (FGM).
Design:
A retrospective observational study comprising 94 women with type 3 FGM who gave birth from 2008–2012.
Method:
Outcomes described in maternity notes of women with deinfibulation performed prior to labour (n=62) compared with ‘not deinfibulated before labour’ (n=32). Secondary analysis was then performed excluding women who had caesarean sections.
Findings:
Women who were ‘not deinfibulated before labour’ had a significantly greater risk of episiotomy (RR 1.67, P<0.05) and prolonged hospital stay of >2 days (RR 1.33, P<0.05). They also had non-significant increased risk of a postpartum haemorrhage (RR 1.15, P=0.58); prolonged second stage (RR 1.77, P=0.16); and required vaginal packing in theatre (RR 2.6, P =0.17). Apgar scores were no different, and both groups had higher than the national average rates for emergency caesarean section and instrumental birth.
Conclusion:
Type 3 FGM is associated with morbidity in childbirth. When deinfibulation is deferred until labour the risk of morbidity increases.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 430-437 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | British Journal of Midwifery |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Jun 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does the timing of deinfibulation for women with type 3 female genital mutilation affect labour outcomes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver