Donating a kidney to a stranger: Are healthcare professionals facilitating the journey? Results from the BOUnD Study

Hannah Maple, Petrut Gogalniceanu, Rebecca Gare, Lisa Burnapp, Heather Draper, Joseph Chilcot, Sam Norton, Nizam Mamode

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
69 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Unspecified kidney donors (UKDs) are approached cautiously by some transplant professionals. The aim of this study was to interrogate the views of UK transplant professionals towards UKDs and identify potential barriers. A purposely designed questionnaire was validated, piloted and distributed amongst transplant professionals at each of the 23 UK transplant centres. Data captured included personal experiences, attitudes towards organ donation, and specific concerns about UKD. 153 responses were obtained, with representation from all UK centres and professional groups. The majority reported a positive experience with UKDs (81.7%; p < 0.001) and were comfortable with UKDs undergoing major surgery (85.7%; p < 0.001). 43.8% reported UKDs to be more time consuming and 52% felt that a mental health assessment should take place before any medical tests. 77% indicated the need for a lower age limit. The suggested age range was broad (16–50 years). Adjusted mean acceptance scores did not differ by profession (p = 0.68) but higher volume centres were more accepting (46.2 vs. 52.9; p < 0.001). This is the first quantitative study of acceptance by transplant professionals to a large national UKD programme. Support is broad, however potential barriers to donation have been identified, including lack of training. Unified national guidance is needed to address these.

Original languageEnglish
Article number11257
JournalTransplant International
Volume36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Donating a kidney to a stranger: Are healthcare professionals facilitating the journey? Results from the BOUnD Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this