Don't Sweat It: Re-Examining the Somatic Marker Hypothesis Using Variants of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task

Rebecca J. Wright, Tim Rakow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
392 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Current thinking on the role of emotions in decision making has been highly influenced by a theory—the somatic marker hypothesis (SMH), which emphasizes the role of physiological mechanisms in guiding decisions—and by variants of a single task—the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), whose development is closely tied to that theory. To address potential shortcomings in the IGT, we used 3 variants of another task—the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)—as a novel means of testing the SMH via behavioral and physiological arousal (skin conductance) data. We manipulated the emotional content of the task by altering its framing (loss vs. gain) and point of commitment to taking risk (in advance vs. in the moment), while also assessing skin conductance. We find consistent support for elements of the SMH: decisions ending in failure result in higher skin conductance than successes; and those failures inhibit risk taking on subsequent trials. However, we find little support for skin conductance guiding decision making—a core prediction of the SMH.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-65
Number of pages14
JournalDecision
Volume4
Issue number1
Early online date7 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Don't Sweat It: Re-Examining the Somatic Marker Hypothesis Using Variants of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this