King's College London

Research portal

Early specialised palliative care: Interventions, symptoms, problems

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Nete Skjoedt, Anna Thit Johnsen, Per Sjøgren, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Anette Damkier, Christian Gluud, Jane Lindschou, Peter Fayers, Irene J. Higginson, Annette S. Strömgren, Mogens Groenvold

Original languageEnglish
Article number2019002043
JournalBMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
Accepted/In press1 Jan 2020

King's Authors


Background: Few studies have investigated the content of interventions provided in early specialised palliative care (SPC). Objectives: To characterise the content of interventions delivered in early SPC in the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT), a multicentre trial with six participating sites. Methods: A retrospective qualitative and quantitative study coding all new interventions initiated by the palliative teams and documented in the medical records during the 8-week study period of DanPaCT. Interventions were categorised according to (a) symptom/problem prompting the intervention, (b) type of intervention and (c) professional(s) providing the intervention. Results: In total, 145 patients were randomised to the SPC teams. According to the medical records, patients received a median of 3.5 (range 0-22) new interventions in the 8-week intervention-period from the palliative teams. For 24 (18%) of the patients there was no documented interventions in the medical records. The most frequent symptom/problems treated were pain, (100 interventions; 20% of interventions given) and impaired physical function (62; 13% of interventions given). The most frequent type of intervention was pharmacological (232; 42% of interventions given). Conclusions: This is one of the first studies to meticulously investigate the content of interventions documented in the medical records for patients receiving early SPC. Diverse symptoms were treated with many different interventions. However, a relatively low number of interventions were documented. This may explain the lack of effect in DanPaCT but also questions whether all interventions were adequately documented.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454