King's College London

Research portal

Efficacy of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy versus Anxiety Management for Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341–353
Number of pages13
JournalPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Volume83
Issue number6
Early online date16 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014

Documents

  • 51 Fgure 1 BDD CBT AMT 2014

    51_Fgure_1_BDD_CBT_AMT_2014.docx, 107 KB, application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document

    17/10/2014

    Submitted manuscript

  • 51 Tables 1 BDD CBT AMT 2014

    51_Tables_1_BDD_CBT_AMT_2014.docx, 27 KB, application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document

    17/10/2014

    Submitted manuscript

  • 51 BDD CBT AMT 2014

    51_BDD_CBT_AMT_2014.pdf, 136 KB, application/pdf

    Final published version

King's Authors

Abstract

Background: The evidence base for the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for treating body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is weak. Aims: To determine whether CBT is more effective than anxiety management (AM) in an outpatient setting. Method: This was a single-blind stratified parallelgroup randomised controlled trial. The primary endpoint was at 12 weeks, and the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale for BDD (BDD-YBOCS) was the primary outcome measure. Secondary measures for BDD included the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale (BABS), the Appearance Anxiety Inventory (AAI) and the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory (BIQLI). The outcome measures were collected at baseline and week 12. The CBT group, unlike the AM group, had 4 further weekly sessions that were analysed for their added value. Both groups then completed measures at their 1-monthfollow-up. Forty-six participants with a DSM-IV diagnosis of BDD, including those with delusional BDD, were randomly allocated to either CBT or AM. Results: At 12 weeks, CBT was found to be significantly superior to AM on the BDD-YBOCS [β = –7.19; SE (β) = 2.61; p < 0.01; 95% CI = –12.31 to –2.07; d = 0.99] as well as the secondary outcome measures of the BABS, AAI and BIQLI. Further benefits occurred by week 16 within the CBT group. There were no differences in outcome for those with delusional BDD or depression. Conclusions: CBT is an effective intervention for people with BDD even with delusional beliefs or depression and is more effective than AM over 12 weeks.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454