Eliciting psychiatrists' beliefs about side effects of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated psychiatrists' attitudes towards various antipsychotic drugs by designing three versions of a case vignette, varying only in type Of antipsychotic described. Psychiatrists were asked to indicate their preferred management option and whether the patient was suffering from extra-pyramidal side effects (EPSE). We found that less experienced psychiatrists were more likely to switch from a typical to an atypical antipsychotic than the more experienced psychiatrists who were conservative, with significantly fewer suggesting a change in medication. The presence of EPSE was inferred significantly more often by the less experienced psychiatrists who received the typical antipsychotic vignette. The vignette method elicited the underlying assumption that typical antipsychotics are bound to cause side effects, while atypicals virtually never do.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-120
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Eliciting psychiatrists' beliefs about side effects of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this