Embarking on a professional career: social advantage in dentistry and medicine UK dental and medical student applications and admissions, 1996-2011

Victoria Niven; Manoharan Andiappan; Lyndon Bruce Cabot; Jennifer Elizabeth Gallagher

doi:10.1038/s41415-019-0671-2

Embarking on a professional career: social advantage in dentistry and medicine UK dental and medical student applications and admissions, 1996-2011

Victoria Niven, Manoharan Andiappan, Lyndon Bruce Cabot, Jennifer Elizabeth Gallagher

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

359 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives The objectives of this research were to compare trends in applications and admissions to dentistry and medicine by sociodemographic status, country/region, academic experience and attainment, for UK domiciled students, and also to compare the odds of gaining admission to each course.Methods Secondary analysis of student data from University and College Admissions Services (UCAS) for focused, successful, UK domiciled applicants whose preferred subject was medicine or dentistry from 1996-2011. Trends for both programmes were examined using univariate and multivariate analysis including logistic regression, both with and without tariff scores.Results Admission ratios to dentistry and medicine are similar, fluctuating over this period. These professions attracted more applications from females, people of Asian ethnicity, direct entrants to university, pupils from selective schools and Londoners. Males, students of White and Black ethnicity, those from England (excluding London), and from lower social groups, were under-represented. The odds of applicants gaining admission were lowest if male, mature (>20 years), of Black ethnicity, from a lower socioeconomic classification, or domiciled in England. When tariff was included in the model, the odds of acceptance for dentistry and medicine were higher for applicants achieving high tariff scores.Discussion This analysis highlights geographic disparities and demonstrates how certain groups remained under-represented, with social inequalities clearly reflected in admissions. The complexity of the societal challenge in accessing these courses must not be underestimated. Social status, geographic region and selective schools remain important determinants of entry, emphasising the importance of educational reform.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	411-418
Number of pages	8
Journal	British Dental Journal
Volume	227
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0671-2
Publication status	Published - 13 Sept 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1038/s41415-019-0671-2

Embarking on a professional_NIVEN_Published 2019_GREEN AAMAccepted author manuscript, 3.14 MB

Cite this

@article{c7def430f9174c9bade42c85bcbeeb59,

title = "Embarking on a professional career: social advantage in dentistry and medicine UK dental and medical student applications and admissions, 1996-2011",

abstract = "Objectives The objectives of this research were to compare trends in applications and admissions to dentistry and medicine by sociodemographic status, country/region, academic experience and attainment, for UK domiciled students, and also to compare the odds of gaining admission to each course.Methods Secondary analysis of student data from University and College Admissions Services (UCAS) for focused, successful, UK domiciled applicants whose preferred subject was medicine or dentistry from 1996-2011. Trends for both programmes were examined using univariate and multivariate analysis including logistic regression, both with and without tariff scores.Results Admission ratios to dentistry and medicine are similar, fluctuating over this period. These professions attracted more applications from females, people of Asian ethnicity, direct entrants to university, pupils from selective schools and Londoners. Males, students of White and Black ethnicity, those from England (excluding London), and from lower social groups, were under-represented. The odds of applicants gaining admission were lowest if male, mature (>20 years), of Black ethnicity, from a lower socioeconomic classification, or domiciled in England. When tariff was included in the model, the odds of acceptance for dentistry and medicine were higher for applicants achieving high tariff scores.Discussion This analysis highlights geographic disparities and demonstrates how certain groups remained under-represented, with social inequalities clearly reflected in admissions. The complexity of the societal challenge in accessing these courses must not be underestimated. Social status, geographic region and selective schools remain important determinants of entry, emphasising the importance of educational reform.",

author = "Victoria Niven and Manoharan Andiappan and Cabot, {Lyndon Bruce} and Gallagher, {Jennifer Elizabeth}",

year = "2019",

month = sep,

day = "13",

doi = "10.1038/s41415-019-0671-2",

language = "English",

volume = "227",

pages = "411--418",

journal = "British Dental Journal",

issn = "0007-0610",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embarking on a professional career: social advantage in dentistry and medicine UK dental and medical student applications and admissions, 1996-2011

AU - Niven, Victoria

AU - Andiappan, Manoharan

AU - Cabot, Lyndon Bruce

AU - Gallagher, Jennifer Elizabeth

PY - 2019/9/13

Y1 - 2019/9/13

N2 - Objectives The objectives of this research were to compare trends in applications and admissions to dentistry and medicine by sociodemographic status, country/region, academic experience and attainment, for UK domiciled students, and also to compare the odds of gaining admission to each course.Methods Secondary analysis of student data from University and College Admissions Services (UCAS) for focused, successful, UK domiciled applicants whose preferred subject was medicine or dentistry from 1996-2011. Trends for both programmes were examined using univariate and multivariate analysis including logistic regression, both with and without tariff scores.Results Admission ratios to dentistry and medicine are similar, fluctuating over this period. These professions attracted more applications from females, people of Asian ethnicity, direct entrants to university, pupils from selective schools and Londoners. Males, students of White and Black ethnicity, those from England (excluding London), and from lower social groups, were under-represented. The odds of applicants gaining admission were lowest if male, mature (>20 years), of Black ethnicity, from a lower socioeconomic classification, or domiciled in England. When tariff was included in the model, the odds of acceptance for dentistry and medicine were higher for applicants achieving high tariff scores.Discussion This analysis highlights geographic disparities and demonstrates how certain groups remained under-represented, with social inequalities clearly reflected in admissions. The complexity of the societal challenge in accessing these courses must not be underestimated. Social status, geographic region and selective schools remain important determinants of entry, emphasising the importance of educational reform.

AB - Objectives The objectives of this research were to compare trends in applications and admissions to dentistry and medicine by sociodemographic status, country/region, academic experience and attainment, for UK domiciled students, and also to compare the odds of gaining admission to each course.Methods Secondary analysis of student data from University and College Admissions Services (UCAS) for focused, successful, UK domiciled applicants whose preferred subject was medicine or dentistry from 1996-2011. Trends for both programmes were examined using univariate and multivariate analysis including logistic regression, both with and without tariff scores.Results Admission ratios to dentistry and medicine are similar, fluctuating over this period. These professions attracted more applications from females, people of Asian ethnicity, direct entrants to university, pupils from selective schools and Londoners. Males, students of White and Black ethnicity, those from England (excluding London), and from lower social groups, were under-represented. The odds of applicants gaining admission were lowest if male, mature (>20 years), of Black ethnicity, from a lower socioeconomic classification, or domiciled in England. When tariff was included in the model, the odds of acceptance for dentistry and medicine were higher for applicants achieving high tariff scores.Discussion This analysis highlights geographic disparities and demonstrates how certain groups remained under-represented, with social inequalities clearly reflected in admissions. The complexity of the societal challenge in accessing these courses must not be underestimated. Social status, geographic region and selective schools remain important determinants of entry, emphasising the importance of educational reform.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072211219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41415-019-0671-2

DO - 10.1038/s41415-019-0671-2

M3 - Article

SN - 0007-0610

VL - 227

SP - 411

EP - 418

JO - British Dental Journal

JF - British Dental Journal

IS - 5

ER -

Embarking on a professional career: social advantage in dentistry and medicine UK dental and medical student applications and admissions, 1996-2011

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this