Abstract
Enthymemes, arguments with incomplete structure, are a ubiquitous feature
of human communication and argumentation. This paper proposes a way of
representing enthymemes and arguments within the ASPIC+ framework, and how
enthymemes are constructed based on estimates of shared knowledge. It then proposes
a framework in which agents are capable of constructing a model of other
agent’s knowledge.
of human communication and argumentation. This paper proposes a way of
representing enthymemes and arguments within the ASPIC+ framework, and how
enthymemes are constructed based on estimates of shared knowledge. It then proposes
a framework in which agents are capable of constructing a model of other
agent’s knowledge.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Computational Models of Argument |
Editors | Simon Parsons, Nir Oren, Chris Reed, Federico Cerutti |
Publisher | IOS Press |
Pages | 325-332 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Volume | 226 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-61499-436-7 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-61499-435-0 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Publication series
Name | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications |
---|---|
Publisher | IOS Press |