Erring and learning in clinical practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper discusses error types, their possible consequences and the doctors who make them. There is no single, all-encompassing typology of medical errors. They are frequently multifactorial in origin and arise from the mental processes of individuals; from defects in perception, thinking, reasoning, planning and interpretation and from failures of team-working, omissions and poorly executed actions. They also arise from inadequately designed and operated healthcare systems or procedures. The paper considers error-truth relatedness, the approach of UK courts to medical errors, the learning opportunities which flow from error recognition and the need for personal and professional self awareness of clinical fallibilities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S26 - S30
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume52
Issue numberSUPPL.
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2002

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erring and learning in clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this