Original language | English |
---|
Pages (from-to) | 767-782 |
---|
Number of pages | 16 |
---|
Journal | Journal of European Integration |
---|
Volume | 42 |
---|
Issue number | 5 |
---|
Early online date | 3 Jul 2020 |
---|
DOIs | |
---|
Accepted/In press | 4 May 2020 |
---|
E-pub ahead of print | 3 Jul 2020 |
---|
Published | Aug 2020 |
---|
Additional links | |
---|
Paper 10 - definitive version June 2020
Paper_10_definitive_version_June_2020.docx, 102 KB, application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Uploaded date:10 Jun 2020
Version:Accepted author manuscript
EU foreign policy has become increasingly politicised over the past years, amongst others as a consequence of the succession of crises. Crises may engender processes of crisis framing and contestation. This article focuses on how the policy demands being voiced in these processes of contestation are channelled through the institutional context. Drawing on insights from American Political Development (APD), it is expounded that this process is shaped by 1) historically created institutional arrangements shaping EU foreign policy through established institutionalised frames and 2) the way external crises generate novel frames that challenge and confront these. Crises and political conflict can ‘evaporate’ existing frames, yet dominant and engrained arrangements subsequently constrain which crises frames are deemed acceptable and which frames are institutionalised. It illustrates this dialectic investigating the dynamics of contestation and politicisation of European Neighbourhood Policy reform after the Arab uprisings and the Ukraine crisis.