King's College London

Research portal

Evaluating participatory development: tyranny, power and (re)politicisation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)557 - 578
Number of pages22
JournalThird World Quarterly
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
PublishedMar 2004

King's Authors

Abstract

Ever since participation entered mainstream development discourse, critics have attacked it as form of political control. If development is indeed an lanti-politics machine' (Ferguson, 1994), the claim is that participation provides a remarkably efficient means of greasing its wheels. But do participatory practices and discourse necessarily represent the de-politicisation of development? This paper aims to provide an answer in two distinct ways. First, it examines the 'de-politicisation' critique, arguing that, while participation may indeed be a form of 'subjection', its consequences are not predetermined and its subjects are never completely controlled. Second, it investigates participatory development's ability to open up new spaces for political action, arguing that celebrations of 'individual liberation' and critiques of 'subjection to the system' both over-simplify participation's power effects. To re-politicise participation, empowerment must be re-imagined as an open-end and ongoing process of engagement with political struggles at a range of spatial scales.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454