Evaluation of an inspiratory muscle trainer in healthy humans

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of an inspiratory muscle trainer in healthy humans

AU - Hart, N

AU - Sylvester, K

AU - Ward, S

AU - Cramer, D

AU - Moxham, J

AU - Polkey, M I

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The Powerbreathe (R) is an inspiratory muscle trainer promoted as improving inspiratory muscle strength (and consequently exercise performance) in athletes and patients with respiratory disease. No published evidence supports its efficacy. We performed a prospective randomized controlled study in which 12 normal subjects received either Powerbreathe (R) training or sham training for a 6-week period. The primary outcome measure was diaphragm strength evaluated as twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure (Tw Pdi) but secondary outcome measures were provided by full respiratory muscle assessment and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. An advantage to training was observed when outcome was assessed by maximal static inspiratory mouth pressure (mean advantage 14.5cm H2O, 95% CI 2.2-26.9cm H2O, P=0.025). However, no significant difference was observed between the groups in any other parameter. In particular the Delta Tw Pdi was not different between groups (mean 'advantage' -0.7 cmH(2)O, 95% CI-70-+/-5.5 cmH(2)O, P=0.8). The continued sale and use of the Powerbreathe (R) device is not justified by our data. A sample size calculation showed that 234 subjects would need to be randomized to definitively refute the hypothesis that Powerbreathe (R) improves Tw Pdi and we argue that such a study is required.

AB - The Powerbreathe (R) is an inspiratory muscle trainer promoted as improving inspiratory muscle strength (and consequently exercise performance) in athletes and patients with respiratory disease. No published evidence supports its efficacy. We performed a prospective randomized controlled study in which 12 normal subjects received either Powerbreathe (R) training or sham training for a 6-week period. The primary outcome measure was diaphragm strength evaluated as twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure (Tw Pdi) but secondary outcome measures were provided by full respiratory muscle assessment and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. An advantage to training was observed when outcome was assessed by maximal static inspiratory mouth pressure (mean advantage 14.5cm H2O, 95% CI 2.2-26.9cm H2O, P=0.025). However, no significant difference was observed between the groups in any other parameter. In particular the Delta Tw Pdi was not different between groups (mean 'advantage' -0.7 cmH(2)O, 95% CI-70-+/-5.5 cmH(2)O, P=0.8). The continued sale and use of the Powerbreathe (R) device is not justified by our data. A sample size calculation showed that 234 subjects would need to be randomized to definitively refute the hypothesis that Powerbreathe (R) improves Tw Pdi and we argue that such a study is required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034944175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/rmed.2001.1069

DO - 10.1053/rmed.2001.1069

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 526

EP - 531

JO - Respiratory Medicine

JF - Respiratory Medicine

IS - 6

ER -