TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of DISORDER: retrospective image motion correction for volumetric brain MRI in a pediatric setting
AU - Vecchiato, Katy
AU - Egloff Collado, Alexia
AU - Carney, Olivia
AU - Siddiqui, Ata
AU - Hughes, Emer
AU - Dillon, Louise
AU - Colford, Kathleen
AU - Green, Elaine
AU - Teixeira, Rui Pedro A. G.
AU - Price, Anthony
AU - Ferrazzi, Giulio
AU - Hajnal, Jo
AU - Carmichael, David
AU - Cordero-Grande, Lucilio
AU - O'Muircheartaigh, Jonathan
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosures: Emer Hughes—UNRELATED: Employment: Kings College London. Kathleen Colford—UNRELATED: Employment: Kings College London. Anthony Price—RELATED: Grant: ERC grant agreement no. 319456 (dHCP project), Comments: Covers salary*. Joseph Hajnal—RELATED: Grant: ERC, Comments: Research grant that supported development of the underlying methodology*. David Carmichael—UNRELATED: Consultancy: Ives EEG Solutions, Comments: Consultancy for electrode safety testing performed in November 2017; Grants/ Grants Pending: I have grants awarded from GOSHCC a UK children’s medical charity*. Lucilio Cordero-Grande—RELATED: Grant: European Research Council/ Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain, Comments: Funds to pay salary respectively at King’s College London/Technical University of Madrid*. Jonathan O’Muircheartaigh—RELATED: Grant: Wellcome Trust*; UNRELATED: Employment: King’s College London. *Money paid to institution.
Funding Information:
This research received funding from a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (Grant Number 206675/Z/17/Z). The study was also supported in part by the Wellcome Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Center for Medical Engineering at King’s College London (grant WT 203148/Z/16/Z), the Medical Research Council (UK) (grants MR/ K006355/1 and MR/LO11530/1), and Medical Research Council Center for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King’s College London (MR/N026063/1). Infrastructure support was provided by the National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Center at South London, Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, the National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Center at Guys, and St Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Paper previously presented as a poster at: European Congress of Magnetic Resonance in Neuropediatrics, February 26-29, 2020; in Marseille, France. Please address correspondence to Dr. Katy Vecchiato, MD, Centre for the Developing Brain, School Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, King’s College London, First Floor, South Wing, St Thomas’ Hospital, SE17EH, London, United Kingdom; e-mail: [email protected]
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society of Neuroradiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Head motion causes image degradation in brain MR imaging examinations, negatively impacting image quality, especially in pediatric populations. Here, we used a retrospective motion correction technique in children and assessed image quality improvement for 3D MR imaging acquisitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively acquired brain MR imaging at 3T using 3D sequences, T1-weighted MPRAGE, T2-weighted TSE, and FLAIR in 32 unsedated children, including 7 with epilepsy (age range, 2-18 years). We implemented a novel motion correction technique through a modification of k-space data acquisition: Distributed and Incoherent Sample Orders for Reconstruction Deblurring by using Encoding Redundancy (DISORDER). For each participant and technique, we obtained 3 reconstructions as acquired (Aq), after DISORDER motion correction (Di), and Di with additional outlier rejection (DiOut). We analyzed 288 images quantitatively, measuring 2 objective no-reference image quality metrics: gradient entropy (GE) and MPRAGE white matter (WM) homogeneity. As a qualitative metric, we presented blinded and randomized images to 2 expert neuroradiologists who scored them for clinical readability. RESULTS: Both image quality metrics improved after motion correction for all modalities, and improvement correlated with the amount of intrascan motion. Neuroradiologists also considered the motion corrected images as of higher quality (Wilcoxon z ¼ -3.164 for MPRAGE; z ¼ -2.066 for TSE; z ¼ -2.645 for FLAIR; all P,.05). CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective image motion correction with DISORDER increased image quality both from an objective and qualitative perspective. In 75% of sessions, at least 1 sequence was improved by this approach, indicating the benefit of this technique in unsedated children for both clinical and research environments.
AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Head motion causes image degradation in brain MR imaging examinations, negatively impacting image quality, especially in pediatric populations. Here, we used a retrospective motion correction technique in children and assessed image quality improvement for 3D MR imaging acquisitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively acquired brain MR imaging at 3T using 3D sequences, T1-weighted MPRAGE, T2-weighted TSE, and FLAIR in 32 unsedated children, including 7 with epilepsy (age range, 2-18 years). We implemented a novel motion correction technique through a modification of k-space data acquisition: Distributed and Incoherent Sample Orders for Reconstruction Deblurring by using Encoding Redundancy (DISORDER). For each participant and technique, we obtained 3 reconstructions as acquired (Aq), after DISORDER motion correction (Di), and Di with additional outlier rejection (DiOut). We analyzed 288 images quantitatively, measuring 2 objective no-reference image quality metrics: gradient entropy (GE) and MPRAGE white matter (WM) homogeneity. As a qualitative metric, we presented blinded and randomized images to 2 expert neuroradiologists who scored them for clinical readability. RESULTS: Both image quality metrics improved after motion correction for all modalities, and improvement correlated with the amount of intrascan motion. Neuroradiologists also considered the motion corrected images as of higher quality (Wilcoxon z ¼ -3.164 for MPRAGE; z ¼ -2.066 for TSE; z ¼ -2.645 for FLAIR; all P,.05). CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective image motion correction with DISORDER increased image quality both from an objective and qualitative perspective. In 75% of sessions, at least 1 sequence was improved by this approach, indicating the benefit of this technique in unsedated children for both clinical and research environments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105178476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1101/2020.09.09.20190777
DO - 10.1101/2020.09.09.20190777
M3 - Article
SN - 0195-6108
VL - 42
SP - 774
EP - 781
JO - AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
JF - AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
IS - 4
ER -