Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Kathryn Wolhuter, Harry J Whitwell, Christopher H Switzer, Joseph R Burgoyne, John F Timms, Philip Eaton
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 438-450.e5 |
Journal | MOLECULAR CELL |
Volume | 69 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 18 Jan 2018 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 20 Dec 2017 |
E-pub ahead of print | 18 Jan 2018 |
Published | 1 Feb 2018 |
Evidence against Stable Protein_BURGOYNE_Publishedonline18January2018_GOLD VoR (CC BY)
Evidence_against_Stable_Protein_BURGOYNE_Publishedonline18January2018_GOLD_VoR_CC_BY_.pdf, 3.14 MB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:14 Dec 2020
Version:Final published version
Licence:CC BY
S-nitrosation, commonly referred to as S-nitrosylation, is widely regarded as a ubiquitous, stable post-translational modification that directly regulates many proteins. Such a widespread role would appear to be incompatible with the inherent lability of the S-nitroso bond, especially its propensity to rapidly react with thiols to generate disulfide bonds. As anticipated, we observed robust and widespread protein S-nitrosation after exposing cells to nitrosocysteine or lipopolysaccharide. Proteins detected using the ascorbate-dependent biotin switch method are typically interpreted to be directly regulated by S-nitrosation. However, these S-nitrosated proteins are shown to predominantly comprise transient intermediates leading to disulfide bond formation. These disulfides are likely to be the dominant end effectors resulting from elevations in nitrosating cellular nitric oxide species. We propose that S-nitrosation primarily serves as a transient intermediate leading to disulfide formation. Overall, we conclude that the current widely held perception that stable S-nitrosation directly regulates the function of many proteins is significantly incorrect.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454