Evidence for bulk flow of brain interstitial fluid: significance for physiology and pathology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

676 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This review surveys evidence for the flow of brain interstitial fluid (ISF) via preferential pathways through the brain, and its relation to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Studies over >100 years have raised several controversial points, not all of them resolved. Recent studies have usefully combined a histological and a mathematical approach. Taken together the evidence indicates an ISF bulk flow rate of 0.1-0.3 mul min(-1) g(-1) in rat brain along preferential pathways especially perivascular spaces and axon tracts. The main source of this fluid is likely to be the brain capillary endothelium, which has the necessary ion transporters, channels and water permeability to generate fluid at a low rate, c1/100th of the rate per square centimeter of CSF secretion across choroid plexus epithelium. There is also evidence that a proportion of CSF may recycle from the subarachnoid space into arterial perivascular spaces on the ventral surface of the brain, and join the circulating ISF, draining back via venous perivascular spaces and axon tracts into CSF compartments, and out both through arachnoid granulations and along cranial nerves to the lymphatics of the neck. The bulk flow of ISF has implications for non-synaptic cell:cell communication (volume transmission); for drug delivery, distribution, and clearance; for brain ionic homeostasis and its disturbance in brain edema; for the immune function of the brain; for the clearance of beta-amyloid deposits; and for the migration of cells (malignant cells, stem cells). (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)545 - 552
Number of pages8
JournalNeurochemistry International
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence for bulk flow of brain interstitial fluid: significance for physiology and pathology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this