Evidence submitted to Inquiry on UK accession to Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)

Sarah Tzinieris

Evidence submitted to Inquiry on UK accession to Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)

Sarah Tzinieris

War Studies

Research output: Other contribution

65 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This is a submission of evidence based on research conducted at the Centre for Science and Security Studies (CSSS) in the Department of War Studies at King’s College London. The views presented belong solely to me and do not necessarily reflect the views of King’s College London. The submission is divided into two parts: the first part reflects on broad themes connected to the UK’s accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) – where I essentially argue that the benefits of joining the CPTPP are mainly strategic rather than economic (and both of these imperatives also confer substantive risks); the second part seeks to answer some of the specific questions put forward to the Inquiry, in view of these being of special interest to the House of Lords.

Original language	English
Type	Written evidence to House of Lords Inquiry
Publisher	House of Lords, UK Parliament
Place of Publication	London
Publication status	Published - 24 Oct 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

Evidence submitted to Inquiry_TZINIERIS_Submitted4August2023Final published version, 333 KB

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5804/ldselect/ldintagr/70/70.pdf

Cite this

@misc{f66cc81ba72647dc9d9bb97f41146cb7,

title = "Evidence submitted to Inquiry on UK accession to Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)",

abstract = "This is a submission of evidence based on research conducted at the Centre for Science and Security Studies (CSSS) in the Department of War Studies at King{\textquoteright}s College London. The views presented belong solely to me and do not necessarily reflect the views of King{\textquoteright}s College London. The submission is divided into two parts: the first part reflects on broad themes connected to the UK{\textquoteright}s accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) – where I essentially argue that the benefits of joining the CPTPP are mainly strategic rather than economic (and both of these imperatives also confer substantive risks); the second part seeks to answer some of the specific questions put forward to the Inquiry, in view of these being of special interest to the House of Lords. ",

author = "Sarah Tzinieris",

note = "Written evidence reference no.: ACP0002",

year = "2023",

month = oct,

day = "24",

language = "English",

publisher = "House of Lords, UK Parliament",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Evidence submitted to Inquiry on UK accession to Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)

AU - Tzinieris, Sarah

N1 - Written evidence reference no.: ACP0002

PY - 2023/10/24

Y1 - 2023/10/24

N2 - This is a submission of evidence based on research conducted at the Centre for Science and Security Studies (CSSS) in the Department of War Studies at King’s College London. The views presented belong solely to me and do not necessarily reflect the views of King’s College London. The submission is divided into two parts: the first part reflects on broad themes connected to the UK’s accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) – where I essentially argue that the benefits of joining the CPTPP are mainly strategic rather than economic (and both of these imperatives also confer substantive risks); the second part seeks to answer some of the specific questions put forward to the Inquiry, in view of these being of special interest to the House of Lords.

AB - This is a submission of evidence based on research conducted at the Centre for Science and Security Studies (CSSS) in the Department of War Studies at King’s College London. The views presented belong solely to me and do not necessarily reflect the views of King’s College London. The submission is divided into two parts: the first part reflects on broad themes connected to the UK’s accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) – where I essentially argue that the benefits of joining the CPTPP are mainly strategic rather than economic (and both of these imperatives also confer substantive risks); the second part seeks to answer some of the specific questions put forward to the Inquiry, in view of these being of special interest to the House of Lords.

M3 - Other contribution

PB - House of Lords, UK Parliament

CY - London

ER -

Evidence submitted to Inquiry on UK accession to Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this