Evolutionary psychology as public science and boundary work

A Cassidy*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)
312 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper explores the phenomena of public scientific debates, where scientific controversies are argued out in public fora such as the mass media, using the case of popular evolutionary psychology in the UK of the 1990s. An earlier quantitative analysis of the UK press coverage of the subject (Cassidy, 2005) suggested that academics associated with evolutionary psychology had been unusually active in the media at that time, particularly in association with the publication of popular science books on the subject. Previous research by Turner, by Gieryn, and by Bucchi has established the relationship between such appeals to the public domain and the establishment of scientific legitimacy and academic disciplinary boundaries. Following this work, I argue here that popular science has, in this case, provided a creative space for scientists, outside of the constraints of ordinary academic discourse, allowing them to reach across scientific boundaries in order to claim expertise in the study of human beings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-205
Number of pages31
JournalPUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Keywords

  • SCIENTISTS
  • PRESS
  • MEDIA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evolutionary psychology as public science and boundary work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Communicating the Social Sciences: A Specific Challenge?

    Cassidy, A., 2014, Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd Edition. Bucchi, M. & Trench, B. (eds.). London ; New York: Routledge, p. 186-197 12 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Open Access
    File

Cite this