TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining student engagement with science through a Bourdieusian notion of field
AU - Godec, Spela
AU - King, Heather
AU - Archer, Louise
AU - Dawson, Emily
AU - Seakins, Amy
PY - 2018/8/15
Y1 - 2018/8/15
N2 - Student engagement with science is a long-standing, central interest within science education research. In this paper, we explore how Bourdieu's theory (originally proposed to explain the reproduction of social inequalities in society) could be applied to understanding student engagement with science. Specifically, we explore how the concepts of field, capital and habitus can be used to make sense of what happened in an inner London secondary science classroom that we observed over the course of one academic year. We draw on data collected through science lesson observations, interviews and discussion groups with students, and interviews with the teacher. We conclude that applying Bourdieusian theory can help better understand differential patterns of student engagement by directing attention to the alignment between students’ habitus and capital, and the field. We also discuss how a greater focus on the notion of field can be useful for planning future interventions aimed at making science education more equitable.
AB - Student engagement with science is a long-standing, central interest within science education research. In this paper, we explore how Bourdieu's theory (originally proposed to explain the reproduction of social inequalities in society) could be applied to understanding student engagement with science. Specifically, we explore how the concepts of field, capital and habitus can be used to make sense of what happened in an inner London secondary science classroom that we observed over the course of one academic year. We draw on data collected through science lesson observations, interviews and discussion groups with students, and interviews with the teacher. We conclude that applying Bourdieusian theory can help better understand differential patterns of student engagement by directing attention to the alignment between students’ habitus and capital, and the field. We also discuss how a greater focus on the notion of field can be useful for planning future interventions aimed at making science education more equitable.
U2 - 10.1007/s11191-018-9988-5
DO - 10.1007/s11191-018-9988-5
M3 - Article
SN - 0926-7220
VL - 27
SP - 501
EP - 521
JO - Science & Education
JF - Science & Education
IS - 5-6
ER -