Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Excluding exceptions : Housing non-affordability and the oppression of environmental sustainability. / Hoggart, K; Henderson, S.
In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 181 - 196.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Excluding exceptions
T2 - Housing non-affordability and the oppression of environmental sustainability
AU - Hoggart, K
AU - Henderson, S
PY - 2005/4
Y1 - 2005/4
N2 - This paper explores the provision of homes for less wealthy households in rural England. By allowing 'exceptions' to UK planning law to provide low-income housing for local residents, the national government seeks to secure dwellings for the less wealthy and so sustain socially mixed rural villages. This paper explores how the production of homes through the exception policy is not conducive to the construction of many new houses. The particular emphasis in the paper is on how responsible agents are discouraged from being more active in erecting new village homes for low-income households. Empirically, the paper draws on documents, interviews and a social survey in the counties of Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Norfolk to investigate the process of delivering rural exception homes. It is concluded that, despite Government assertions that a socially mixed countryside is desirable, the decision-making criteria that dominate the worldviews of agents in social housing provision work against this outcome. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
AB - This paper explores the provision of homes for less wealthy households in rural England. By allowing 'exceptions' to UK planning law to provide low-income housing for local residents, the national government seeks to secure dwellings for the less wealthy and so sustain socially mixed rural villages. This paper explores how the production of homes through the exception policy is not conducive to the construction of many new houses. The particular emphasis in the paper is on how responsible agents are discouraged from being more active in erecting new village homes for low-income households. Empirically, the paper draws on documents, interviews and a social survey in the counties of Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Norfolk to investigate the process of delivering rural exception homes. It is concluded that, despite Government assertions that a socially mixed countryside is desirable, the decision-making criteria that dominate the worldviews of agents in social housing provision work against this outcome. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.03.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.03.004
M3 - Article
VL - 21
SP - 181
EP - 196
JO - Journal of Rural Studies
JF - Journal of Rural Studies
SN - 0743-0167
IS - 2
ER -
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454