Executable logic for dialogical argumentation

Elizabeth Black, Anthony Hunter

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paper

10 Citations (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Argumentation between agents through dialogue is an important cognitive activity. There have been a number of proposals for formalizing dialogical argumentation. However, each proposal involves a number of quite complex definitions, and there is significant diversity in the way different proposals define similar features. This complexity and diversity has hindered analysis and comparison of the space of proposals. To address this, we present a general approach to defining a wide variety of systems for dialogical argumentation. Our solution is to use an executable logic to specify individual systems for dialogical argumentation. This means we have a common language for specifying a wide range of systems, we can compare systems in terms of a range of standard properties, we can identify interesting classes of system, and we can execute the specification of each system to analyse it empirically.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationECAI 2012
Subtitle of host publication20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 27-31 August 2012, Montpellier, France
EditorsLuc De Raedt, Christian Bessiere, Didier Dubois, Patrick Doherty, Paolo Frasconi, Fredrik Heintz, Peter Lucas
Place of PublicationAmsterdam
PublisherIOS Press
Pages15-20
ISBN (Electronic)9781614990987
ISBN (Print)9781614990970
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Publication series

NameFrontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
PublisherIOS Press
Volume242
ISSN (Print)0922-6389
ISSN (Electronic)1879-8314

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Executable logic for dialogical argumentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this