TY - JOUR
T1 - Experiential factors affecting the empathy of students in their pre-clinical year(s) of 21 universities
AU - Vigoda, Joseph
AU - Adeniyi, Adedeji
AU - Tudor, Lisl
AU - Brassett, Cecilia
AU - McWatt, Sean
AU - Sagoo, Mandeep G.
AU - Wingate, Richard
AU - Chien, Chung Liang
AU - Traxler, Hannes
AU - Waschke, Jens
AU - Vielmuth, Franziska
AU - Sigmund, Anna
AU - Sakurai, Takeshi
AU - Yamada, Yukari
AU - Zeroual, Mina
AU - Olsen, Jorgen
AU - El-Batti, Salma
AU - Viranta-Kovanen, Suvi
AU - Keay, Kevin
AU - Kitahara, Shuji
AU - Martínez-Abadías, Neus
AU - Esteban-Torné, Maria E.
AU - Helms, Jill
AU - Sforza, Chiarella
AU - Gagliano, Nicoletta
AU - Norris, Madeleine
AU - Harmon, Derek
AU - Yasui, Masato
AU - Ichiko, Midori
AU - Lee, Sammi
AU - Reid, Shaina
AU - Lang, Ariella
AU - Kunzel, Carol
AU - Joseph, Michael
AU - Buehler, Leo
AU - Hardy, Mark
AU - Patel, Snehal
AU - Bernd, Paulette
AU - Kielstein, Heike
AU - Stewart, William
AU - Kellett, Anne
AU - Wu, Anette
AU - Noel, Geoffroy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© FASEB.
PY - 2022/5/13
Y1 - 2022/5/13
N2 - Hands-on cadaveric dissection is often considered an important factor in shaping the emotional identity of medical and dental students as healthcare providers. This study explores how demographic and/or experiential factors affect the empathy of students in their pre-clinical year(s) of medical or dental school. In the Summer of 2021 and Fall of 2021, a total of 530 students from 21 universities around the world participating in the International Collaboration and Exchange (ICE) Program, completed a validated questionnaire containing the Santa Clara Brief Compassion (SCBC) Scale and the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ). Responses to the SCBC and TEQ were tested for variance and covariance against age group, sex, clinical experience, year of health professional school, format of anatomy education, hours of study on prosections and/or hours of hands-on cadaveric dissection in their respective curricula; and whether their school provides an opportunity for reflection, information about the body donors, a memorial service, and/or addresses empathy in their curricula. Results show that having 40-90 hours of hands-on cadaveric dissection vs 0 hours yielded higher SCBC averages (p = 0.0206) and TEQ scores (p = 0.0031); and having 20-40 hours of hands-on cadaveric dissection vs 0 hours also resulted in higher TEQ scores (p = 0.0105). Comparisons of hours of study on prosections, format of anatomy education, clinical experience, and year of health professional school yielded no significant results in relation to empathy scores. Our study found that across different regions of the world, curricula emphasizing dissection are best at preparing students to become more empathetic healthcare providers. While none of the other curricular factors proved significant, this study confirms the merit of hands-on cadaveric dissection in the emotional development of medical and dental students.
AB - Hands-on cadaveric dissection is often considered an important factor in shaping the emotional identity of medical and dental students as healthcare providers. This study explores how demographic and/or experiential factors affect the empathy of students in their pre-clinical year(s) of medical or dental school. In the Summer of 2021 and Fall of 2021, a total of 530 students from 21 universities around the world participating in the International Collaboration and Exchange (ICE) Program, completed a validated questionnaire containing the Santa Clara Brief Compassion (SCBC) Scale and the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ). Responses to the SCBC and TEQ were tested for variance and covariance against age group, sex, clinical experience, year of health professional school, format of anatomy education, hours of study on prosections and/or hours of hands-on cadaveric dissection in their respective curricula; and whether their school provides an opportunity for reflection, information about the body donors, a memorial service, and/or addresses empathy in their curricula. Results show that having 40-90 hours of hands-on cadaveric dissection vs 0 hours yielded higher SCBC averages (p = 0.0206) and TEQ scores (p = 0.0031); and having 20-40 hours of hands-on cadaveric dissection vs 0 hours also resulted in higher TEQ scores (p = 0.0105). Comparisons of hours of study on prosections, format of anatomy education, clinical experience, and year of health professional school yielded no significant results in relation to empathy scores. Our study found that across different regions of the world, curricula emphasizing dissection are best at preparing students to become more empathetic healthcare providers. While none of the other curricular factors proved significant, this study confirms the merit of hands-on cadaveric dissection in the emotional development of medical and dental students.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130056635&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R2742
DO - 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R2742
M3 - Article
C2 - 35556827
AN - SCOPUS:85130056635
SN - 1530-6860
VL - 36
JO - FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
JF - FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
ER -