Explaining outcomes in major system change: a qualitative study of implementing centralised acute stroke services in two large metropolitan regions in England.

Naomi Judith Fulop; A Ramsey; Catherine Perry; Ruth Boaden; Christopher John McKevitt; Anthony G. Rudd; S.J. Turner; P. J. Tyrrell; Charles David Alexander Wolfe; S Morris

doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0445-z

Explaining outcomes in major system change: a qualitative study of implementing centralised acute stroke services in two large metropolitan regions in England.

Naomi Judith Fulop
, A Ramsey
, Catherine Perry
, Ruth Boaden
, Christopher John McKevitt
, Anthony G. Rudd
, S.J. Turner
, P. J. Tyrrell
, Charles David Alexander Wolfe
, S Morris

Population Health Sciences

UCL University College London
University of Manchester
GSTT Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

55 Citations (Scopus)

241 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Implementing major system change in healthcare is not well understood. This gap may be addressed by analysing change in terms of interrelated components identified in the implementation literature, including decision to change, intervention selection, implementation approaches, implementation outcomes, and intervention outcomes.

Original language	English
Article number	11
Pages (from-to)	80
Journal	Implementation Science
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0445-z
Publication status	Published - 3 Jun 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.1186/s13012-016-0445-zLicence: CC BY

Explaining outcomes in major_FULOP_Accepted25May2016_GOLD VoRFinal published version, 2.29 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Fulop, N. J., Ramsey, A., Perry, C., Boaden, R., McKevitt, C. J., Rudd, A. G., Turner, S. J., Tyrrell, P. J., Wolfe, C. D. A., & Morris, S. (2016). Explaining outcomes in major system change: a qualitative study of implementing centralised acute stroke services in two large metropolitan regions in England. Implementation Science, 80. Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0445-z

@article{8de366aaeb35466582e04cee3c5db2d8,

title = "Explaining outcomes in major system change: a qualitative study of implementing centralised acute stroke services in two large metropolitan regions in England.",

abstract = "Implementing major system change in healthcare is not well understood. This gap may be addressed by analysing change in terms of interrelated components identified in the implementation literature, including decision to change, intervention selection, implementation approaches, implementation outcomes, and intervention outcomes.",

author = "Fulop, \{Naomi Judith\} and A Ramsey and Catherine Perry and Ruth Boaden and McKevitt, \{Christopher John\} and Rudd, \{Anthony G.\} and S.J. Turner and Tyrrell, \{P. J.\} and Wolfe, \{Charles David Alexander\} and S Morris",

year = "2016",

month = jun,

day = "3",

doi = "10.1186/s13012-016-0445-z",

language = "English",

pages = "80",

journal = "Implementation Science",

issn = "1748-5908",

publisher = "BIOMED CENTRAL LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining outcomes in major system change: a qualitative study of implementing centralised acute stroke services in two large metropolitan regions in England.

AU - Fulop, Naomi Judith

AU - Ramsey, A

AU - Perry, Catherine

AU - Boaden, Ruth

AU - McKevitt, Christopher John

AU - Rudd, Anthony G.

AU - Turner, S.J.

AU - Tyrrell, P. J.

AU - Wolfe, Charles David Alexander

AU - Morris, S

PY - 2016/6/3

Y1 - 2016/6/3

N2 - Implementing major system change in healthcare is not well understood. This gap may be addressed by analysing change in terms of interrelated components identified in the implementation literature, including decision to change, intervention selection, implementation approaches, implementation outcomes, and intervention outcomes.

AB - Implementing major system change in healthcare is not well understood. This gap may be addressed by analysing change in terms of interrelated components identified in the implementation literature, including decision to change, intervention selection, implementation approaches, implementation outcomes, and intervention outcomes.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84975129057

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-016-0445-z

DO - 10.1186/s13012-016-0445-z

M3 - Article

SN - 1748-5908

SP - 80

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

M1 - 11

ER -

Explaining outcomes in major system change: a qualitative study of implementing centralised acute stroke services in two large metropolitan regions in England.

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this