Abstract
Background: Adults born very preterm (i.e., at <33 weeks’ gestation) are more susceptible to long-lasting structural and functional brain alterations and cognitive and socio-emotional difficulties, compared to full-term controls. However, behavioural heterogeneity within very preterm and full-term individuals makes it challenging to find biomarkers of specific outcomes. To address these questions, we parsed brain-behaviour heterogeneity in participants subdivided according to their clinical birth status (very preterm vs full-term) and/or data-driven behavioural phenotype (regardless of birth status).
Methods: Participants were followed up in adulthood (median age 30 years) as part of a wider longitudinal case-control cohort study. The Network Based Statistic approach was used to identify topological components of resting state functional connectivity differentiating between i) 116 very preterm and 83 full-term adults (43% and 57% female, respectively), and ii) data-driven behavioural subgroups identified using consensus clustering (n= 156, 46% female). Age, sex, socio-economic status, and in-scanner head motion were used as confounders in all analyses. Post-hoc two-way group interactions between clinical birth status and behavioural data-driven subgrouping classification labels explored whether functional connectivity differences between very preterm and full-term adults varied according to distinct behavioural outcomes.
Results: Very preterm compared to full-term adults had poorer scores in selective measures of cognitive and socio-emotional processing and displayed complex patterns of hyper- and hypo-connectivity in subsections of the default mode, visual, and ventral attention networks. Stratifying the study participants in terms of their behavioural profiles (irrespective of birth status), identified two data-driven subgroups: An “At-risk” subgroup, characterised by increased cognitive, mental health, and socio-emotional difficulties, displaying hypo-connectivity anchored in frontal opercular and insular regions, relative to a “Resilient” subgroup with more favourable outcomes. No significant interaction was noted between clinical birth status and behavioural data-driven subgrouping classification labels in terms of functional connectivity.
Conclusions: Functional connectivity differentiating between very preterm and full-term adults was dissimilar to functional connectivity differentiating between the data-driven behavioural subgroups. We speculate that functional connectivity alterations observed in very preterm relative to full-term adults may confer both risk and resilience to developing behavioural sequelae associated with very preterm birth, while the localised functional connectivity alterations seen in the “At-risk” subgroup relative to the “Resilient” subgroup may underlie less favourable behavioural outcomes in adulthood, irrespective of birth status.
Methods: Participants were followed up in adulthood (median age 30 years) as part of a wider longitudinal case-control cohort study. The Network Based Statistic approach was used to identify topological components of resting state functional connectivity differentiating between i) 116 very preterm and 83 full-term adults (43% and 57% female, respectively), and ii) data-driven behavioural subgroups identified using consensus clustering (n= 156, 46% female). Age, sex, socio-economic status, and in-scanner head motion were used as confounders in all analyses. Post-hoc two-way group interactions between clinical birth status and behavioural data-driven subgrouping classification labels explored whether functional connectivity differences between very preterm and full-term adults varied according to distinct behavioural outcomes.
Results: Very preterm compared to full-term adults had poorer scores in selective measures of cognitive and socio-emotional processing and displayed complex patterns of hyper- and hypo-connectivity in subsections of the default mode, visual, and ventral attention networks. Stratifying the study participants in terms of their behavioural profiles (irrespective of birth status), identified two data-driven subgroups: An “At-risk” subgroup, characterised by increased cognitive, mental health, and socio-emotional difficulties, displaying hypo-connectivity anchored in frontal opercular and insular regions, relative to a “Resilient” subgroup with more favourable outcomes. No significant interaction was noted between clinical birth status and behavioural data-driven subgrouping classification labels in terms of functional connectivity.
Conclusions: Functional connectivity differentiating between very preterm and full-term adults was dissimilar to functional connectivity differentiating between the data-driven behavioural subgroups. We speculate that functional connectivity alterations observed in very preterm relative to full-term adults may confer both risk and resilience to developing behavioural sequelae associated with very preterm birth, while the localised functional connectivity alterations seen in the “At-risk” subgroup relative to the “Resilient” subgroup may underlie less favourable behavioural outcomes in adulthood, irrespective of birth status.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-32 |
| Number of pages | 32 |
| Journal | Brain Communications |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 12 Nov 2024 |
Keywords
- preterm birth
- clustering
- Resting state functional MRI
- behaviour
- executive function
- phenotyping
- Intrinsic connectivity
