Exposure to case management: relationships to patient characteristics and outcome - Report from the UK700 trial

T Burns, I White, S Byford, M Fiander, F Creed, T Fahy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Trials in community psychiatry must balance rigour with generalisability. The UK700 trial failed to find a significant effect on hospitalisation, but its sample population contained significant heterogeneity of exposure to case management in the two groups. Aims To test whether patients successfully exposed to a minimum of 12 months' intensive case management over the 2-year follow-up period achieved reduced hospitalisation. Method Of 679 participants with hospitalisation data, 84 were identified as having <12 months' exposure owing to prolonged hospitalisation, imprisonment or a combination of the two. These patients were excluded and outcomes tested for the remaining 595 patients. Results Overall reduced case-load size did not reduce hospitalisation or treatment costs over 2 years despite elimination of outliers. Age, previous hospitalisation and source of recruitment to the study all correlated with outcome. Conclusions Case-load reduction is not in itself enough to reduce the need for hospital care in psychosis. Baseline patient characteristics (in particular length of previous hospitalisation and recruitment from in-patient care) have a significant influence and should be allowed for in power calculations. Identifying the optimal clinical profile for patients likely to benefit from intensive case management remains a pressing need for further studies. Declaration of interest None.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)236 - 241
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume181
Issue numberSEPT.
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2002

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exposure to case management: relationships to patient characteristics and outcome - Report from the UK700 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this