King's College London

Research portal

External Validation of a Periodontal Prediction Model for Identification of Diabetes among Saudi Adults

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1176-1181
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Volume21
Issue number10
DOIs
Published2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: We thank Drs Hani Almoharib and Mansour Al-Askar for their substantial contribution during the data collection for this study. Publisher Copyright: © 2021. All Rights Reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

King's Authors

Abstract

Aim and objective: To externally validate the performance of a novel periodontal prediction model (PPM) for identification of diabetes among Saudi adults. Materials and methods: The study was carried out among 150 adults attending primary care clinics in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia). The study adopted a temporal external validation approach, where the performance of the PPM was evaluated in the same location as the development study, but at a later time to allow for some variation between samples. A case-control approach was adopted, where diabetes status was first ascertained, followed by the completion of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC), Canadian Diabetes Risk (CANRISK) tools, and periodontal examinations. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of the PPM (based on the number of missing teeth, the proportion of sites with pocket probing depth >6 mm, and mean pocket probing depth) was 0.514 (95% CI: 0.385, 0.642). The FINDRISC and CANRISK tools had AUC values of 0.871 (95% CI: 0.811-0.931) and 0.927 (95% CI: 0.884-0.971), respectively. The addition of the PPM did not improve the AUC of FINDRISC (p = 0.479) or CANRISK (p = 0.920). The decision curve analysis showed that there was no clinical benefit in adding the PPM to either tool. The PPM was updated with an overall adjustment factor for all existing predictors and three more periodontal measures. Conclusion: In an external sample, the PPM had poor performance for identification of diabetes and no added value when combined with FINDRISC and CANRISK. The performance of the PPM improved after recalibration and extension. Clinical significance: The results underscore the value of externally validating prediction models before applying them in clinical dental practice.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454