King's College London

Research portal

Factors determining the magnitude of the pre-ejection leftward septal motion in left bundle branch block

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Espen W Remme, Steven Niederer, Ola Gjesdal, Kristoffer Russell, Eoin R Hyde, Nicolas Smith, Otto A Smiseth

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1905-1913
Issue number12
Early online date26 Nov 2015
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Nov 2015


King's Authors


AIMS: An abnormal large leftward septal motion prior to ejection is frequently observed in left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients. This motion has been proposed as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Our goal was to investigate factors that influence its magnitude.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Left (LVP) and right ventricular (RVP) pressures and left ventricular (LV) volume were measured in eight canines. After induction of LBBB, LVP and, hence, the transmural septal pressure (PLV-RV = LVP-RVP) increased more slowly (P < 0.01) during the phase when septum moved leftwards. A biventricular finite-element LBBB simulation model confirmed that the magnitude of septal leftward motion depended on reduced rise of PLV-RV. The model showed that leftward septal motion was decreased with shorter activation delay, reduced global or right ventricular (RV) contractility, septal infarction, or when the septum was already displaced into the LV at end diastole by RV volume overload. Both experiments and simulations showed that pre-ejection septal hypercontraction occurs, in part, because the septum performs more of the work pushing blood towards the mitral valve leaflets to close them as the normal lateral wall contribution to this push is lost.

CONCLUSIONS: Left bundle branch block lowers afterload against pre-ejection septal contraction, expressed as slowed rise of PLV-RV, which is a main cause and determinant of the magnitude of leftward septal motion. The motion may be small or absent due to septal infarct, impaired global or RV contractility or RV volume overload, which should be kept in mind if this motion is to be used in evaluation of CRT response.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454