Abstract
This article addresses facts and fallacies about managing worn teeth and challenges some traditional concepts and beliefs about occlusion. Whilst it is accepted that many of the historic occlusal concepts were well intended, closer examination reveals that many were unnecessarily destructive of sound tooth tissues and did not deliver all of their purported benefits. Those fallacies make them less appropriate in the litigious environment of contemporary dental practice. This paper discusses the disadvantages of 'subtractive' dental procedures for the management of tooth wear, and highlights the benefits of proven minimally destructive 'additive' techniques.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 27-31 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Primary Dental Journal |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 May 2020 |
Keywords
- Preserving tooth tissue
- additive techniques
- resin composite
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Facts and Fallacies About Restorative Philosophies for the Management of the Worn Dentition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver