Abstract
Fatigue chronic syndrom (SFC) is the heir-at-law of neurasthenia. Both are seen like physical diseases and share certain therapeutic measures, such as sleep; they have the same symbolic function and enable patients as well as doctors reluctant to psychological dimensions of pathology, to get and express sympathy and attention.
A strong controversy developped these last years concerning the SFC physiopathology particularly concerning the responsibility of viral infectious agents or psychiatric troubles.
The SFC fatigue is unlikely hysterical or neuromuscular but it probably depends on several associated factors; cerebral neurobiochemistry anomalies (possibly induced by an infection or immune reactions), effort perception trouble, affective trouble, lack of physical activity.
The handicap seems to be worse on account of unsuitable care and inefficacious treatment.
Especially sleep, which is often beneficial in a short term, is source of ulterior chronicisation.
Antidepressants are the only justified pharmacological treatment for SFC at the moment. Refering to the existence and the nature of cognitive distortions, the author suggests a cognitivo-behavioural therapy, whose aim is a progressive activity resumption.
| Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 581-595 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Encephale |
| Volume | 20 |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 1994 |