Abstract
Although the financial/Eurozone crisis has profound effects on the EU, European integration scholarship failed to even recognise that there might be a problem. This article argues that this is due to the highly orthodox nature of European integration scholarship and the blind-spots that inhere in its instrumentalist basic code. It makes the case for a heterodox recasting of the production of knowledge about the EU, and argues that post-Keynesian, post-Marxist and neo-Weberian political economy can make significant contributions in that regard.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | N/A |
Pages (from-to) | 647-673 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | MILLENNIUM |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |