Fluctuating capacity and advance decision-making in Bipolar Affective Disorder: Self-binding directives and self-determination

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)
241 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For people with Bipolar Affective Disorder, a self-binding (advance) directive (SBD), by which they commit themselves to treatment during future episodes of mania, even if unwilling, can seem the most rational way to deal with an imperfect predicament. Knowing that mania will almost certainly cause enormous damage to themselves, their preferred solution may well be to allow trusted others to enforce treatment and constraint, traumatic though this may be. No adequate provision exists for drafting a truly effective SBD and efforts to establish such provision are hampered by very valid, but also paralysing ethical, clinical and legal concerns. Effectively, the autonomy and rights of people with bipolar are being ‘protected’ through being denied an opportunity to protect themselves. From a standpoint firmly rooted in the clinical context and experience of mania, this article argues that an SBD, based on a patient-centred evaluation of capacity to make treatment decisions (DMC-T) and grounded within the clinician–patient relationship, could represent a legitimate and ethically coherent form of self-determination. After setting out background information on fluctuating capacity, mania and advance directives, this article proposes a framework for constructing such an SBD, and considers common objections, possible solutions and suggestions for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-101
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Volume40
Early online date2 May 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fluctuating capacity and advance decision-making in Bipolar Affective Disorder: Self-binding directives and self-determination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this