Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Sarah Birch, Fatma Elsafoury
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 470-484 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 19 Sep 2017 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 17 Aug 2017 |
E-pub ahead of print | 19 Sep 2017 |
Published | 1 Dec 2017 |
Additional links |
Fraud plot or collective_BIRCH_ACCEPTED17August2017_GREEN AAM
Fraud_plot_or_collective_BIRCH_ACCEPTED17August2017_GREEN_AAM.pdf, 882 KB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:17 Aug 2017
Version:Accepted author manuscript
Online discussions of electoral fraud are becoming an increasingly important aspect of the electoral landscape in many contexts, as cyberspace is one of the few places where concerns about electoral conduct can be aired openly and freely. But it is often difficult to assess what this online activity tells us about actual electoral processes. This article analyzes a surge of tweets about electoral fraud at the time of the Scottish independence referendum of 2014 in order to ascertain whether this online activity reflected: (a) actual offline fraud observed by the social media users, (b) a concerted effort to undermine confidence in electoral administration, or (c) a collective delusion. Data mining and machine learning techniques are deployed in this analysis, which comes out strongly in favor of the collective delusion hypothesis.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454