King's College London

Research portal

Freedom to negotiate: A proposal extricating 'capacity' from 'consent'

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Liz Brosnan, Eilionóir Flynn

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)58-76
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Law in Context
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Published1 Mar 2017

King's Authors

Abstract

In this paper, we seek to radically reframe the legal construct of consent from a disability perspective. Drawing on feminist scholarship and human rights standards around 'free and informed consent', we apply a concept of freedom to negotiate to laws regulating both consent to sex and medical treatment - key areas in which the legal agency of people with disabilities (especially people with cognitive disabilities) is routinely denied, restricted or ignored. We set out the essential ingredients for reframing consent: namely, legal personhood, freedom to negotiate and understanding. We also outline conditions (i.e. coercion, undue influence and power imbalances) that impede valid consent. This represents a first attempt to move beyond labelling adults with certain disabilities as lacking the 'mental capacity' necessary to give valid consent - in order to explore in more depth particular expressions of consent or refusal and seek new validity criteria, beyond the label of 'mental incapacity'.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454