TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender and Preterm Birth
T2 - Is male fetal gender a clinically important risk factor for preterm birth in high-risk women?
AU - Teoh, P.J.
AU - Ridout, A.
AU - Seed, P.
AU - Tribe, R.M.
AU - Shennan, A.H.
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Gender differences in several adverse pregnancy outcomes have been described, including preterm labour and delivery. In the low risk population, the male fetus is at significantly higher risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Objectives Our objective was to examine the risk effect of fetal gender on pregnant women at higher risk of preterm birth, and therefore its potential impact on targeting management. Study Design This was an analysis of prospectively collected data from a dedicated inner-city Prematurity Surveillance Clinic over a sixteen-year period. All women were high-risk for preterm delivery in view of their history, which included previous late miscarriage, PTB or significant cervical surgery. Obstetric variables and pregnancy outcomes were compared in male and female babies. Demographic and risk factors were compared between groups, and both spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm delivery rates interrogated (<24, <28, <34 and <37 weeks’ gestation). Risk ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated for each gestational band. Results In this cohort, 14.5% of women (363/2505) delivered before 37 weeks. Pregnant women were stratified by fetal gender and were comparable for referral risk factors and demographic characteristics. There was no significant association between fetal gender and incidence of miscarriage less than 24 weeks (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.10, p = 0.607), or preterm births 24 to 37 weeks RR 1.07 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.40, p = 0.383). Furthermore, analysis by gestational band [<28 RR 0.91 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.37, p = 0.647), <34 RR 1.18 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.57, p = 0.257 and <37 weeks RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.33, p = 0.309)] also showed no effect. This held true for both spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm delivery. In our high-risk cohort there was no gender difference for preeclampsia (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.41, p = 0.725) or preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.50, p = 0.384) Conclusions In a high-risk cohort there was no significant increased risk of miscarriage, spontaneous or iatrogenic PTB, preeclampsia or PPROM for the male fetus. This is contradictory to low-risk populations and confirms that gender need not be integrated into high-risk management protocols for preterm birth.
AB - Gender differences in several adverse pregnancy outcomes have been described, including preterm labour and delivery. In the low risk population, the male fetus is at significantly higher risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Objectives Our objective was to examine the risk effect of fetal gender on pregnant women at higher risk of preterm birth, and therefore its potential impact on targeting management. Study Design This was an analysis of prospectively collected data from a dedicated inner-city Prematurity Surveillance Clinic over a sixteen-year period. All women were high-risk for preterm delivery in view of their history, which included previous late miscarriage, PTB or significant cervical surgery. Obstetric variables and pregnancy outcomes were compared in male and female babies. Demographic and risk factors were compared between groups, and both spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm delivery rates interrogated (<24, <28, <34 and <37 weeks’ gestation). Risk ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated for each gestational band. Results In this cohort, 14.5% of women (363/2505) delivered before 37 weeks. Pregnant women were stratified by fetal gender and were comparable for referral risk factors and demographic characteristics. There was no significant association between fetal gender and incidence of miscarriage less than 24 weeks (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.10, p = 0.607), or preterm births 24 to 37 weeks RR 1.07 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.40, p = 0.383). Furthermore, analysis by gestational band [<28 RR 0.91 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.37, p = 0.647), <34 RR 1.18 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.57, p = 0.257 and <37 weeks RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.33, p = 0.309)] also showed no effect. This held true for both spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm delivery. In our high-risk cohort there was no gender difference for preeclampsia (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.41, p = 0.725) or preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.50, p = 0.384) Conclusions In a high-risk cohort there was no significant increased risk of miscarriage, spontaneous or iatrogenic PTB, preeclampsia or PPROM for the male fetus. This is contradictory to low-risk populations and confirms that gender need not be integrated into high-risk management protocols for preterm birth.
KW - Gender
KW - sex
KW - preterm birth
KW - high-risk
KW - prediction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046354942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.04.025
DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.04.025
M3 - Article
SN - 0301-2115
VL - 225
SP - 155
EP - 159
JO - European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
JF - European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
ER -