King's College London

Research portal

Genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for venous thromboembolism: a systematic and critical review of economic evaluations

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Standard

Genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for venous thromboembolism : a systematic and critical review of economic evaluations. / Lim, Ka Keat; Koleva-Kolarova, Rositsa; Chowienczyk, Philip et al.

In: Pharmacogenomics Journal, Vol. 21, No. 6, 12.2021, p. 625-637.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

Lim, KK, Koleva-Kolarova, R, Chowienczyk, P, Wolfe, CDA & Fox-Rushby, J 2021, 'Genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for venous thromboembolism: a systematic and critical review of economic evaluations', Pharmacogenomics Journal, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 625-637. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-021-00243-7

APA

Lim, K. K., Koleva-Kolarova, R., Chowienczyk, P., Wolfe, C. D. A., & Fox-Rushby, J. (2021). Genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for venous thromboembolism: a systematic and critical review of economic evaluations. Pharmacogenomics Journal, 21(6), 625-637. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-021-00243-7

Vancouver

Lim KK, Koleva-Kolarova R, Chowienczyk P, Wolfe CDA, Fox-Rushby J. Genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for venous thromboembolism: a systematic and critical review of economic evaluations. Pharmacogenomics Journal. 2021 Dec;21(6):625-637. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-021-00243-7

Author

Lim, Ka Keat ; Koleva-Kolarova, Rositsa ; Chowienczyk, Philip et al. / Genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for venous thromboembolism : a systematic and critical review of economic evaluations. In: Pharmacogenomics Journal. 2021 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 625-637.

Bibtex Download

@article{f5b00bf38238481ab228f696bb33ed03,
title = "Genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for venous thromboembolism: a systematic and critical review of economic evaluations",
abstract = "Despite the known contributions of genes, genetic-guided pharmacotherapy has not been routinely implemented for venous thromboembolism (VTE). To examine evidence on cost-effectiveness of genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for VTE, we searched six databases, websites of four HTA agencies and citations, with independent double-reviewers in screening, data extraction, and quality rating. The ten eligible studies, all model-based, examined heterogeneous interventions and comparators. Findings varied widely; testing was cost-saving in two base-cases, cost-effective in four, not cost-effective in three, dominated in one. Of 22 model variables that changed decisions about cost-effectiveness, effectiveness/relative effectiveness of the intervention was the most frequent, albeit of poor quality. Studies consistently lacked details on the provision of interventions and comparators as well as on model development and validation. Besides improving the reporting of interventions, comparators, and methodological details, future economic evaluations should examine strategies recommended in guidelines and testing key model variables for decision uncertainty, to advise clinical implementations.",
author = "Lim, {Ka Keat} and Rositsa Koleva-Kolarova and Philip Chowienczyk and Wolfe, {Charles D.A.} and Julia Fox-Rushby",
note = "Funding Information: Funding The research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy{\textquoteright}s and St Thomas{\textquoteright} NHS Foundation Trust and King{\textquoteright}s College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s). ",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1038/s41397-021-00243-7",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "625--637",
journal = "The pharmacogenomics journal",
issn = "1470-269X",
publisher = "Springer Nature [academic journals on nature.com]",
number = "6",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for venous thromboembolism

T2 - a systematic and critical review of economic evaluations

AU - Lim, Ka Keat

AU - Koleva-Kolarova, Rositsa

AU - Chowienczyk, Philip

AU - Wolfe, Charles D.A.

AU - Fox-Rushby, Julia

N1 - Funding Information: Funding The research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

PY - 2021/12

Y1 - 2021/12

N2 - Despite the known contributions of genes, genetic-guided pharmacotherapy has not been routinely implemented for venous thromboembolism (VTE). To examine evidence on cost-effectiveness of genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for VTE, we searched six databases, websites of four HTA agencies and citations, with independent double-reviewers in screening, data extraction, and quality rating. The ten eligible studies, all model-based, examined heterogeneous interventions and comparators. Findings varied widely; testing was cost-saving in two base-cases, cost-effective in four, not cost-effective in three, dominated in one. Of 22 model variables that changed decisions about cost-effectiveness, effectiveness/relative effectiveness of the intervention was the most frequent, albeit of poor quality. Studies consistently lacked details on the provision of interventions and comparators as well as on model development and validation. Besides improving the reporting of interventions, comparators, and methodological details, future economic evaluations should examine strategies recommended in guidelines and testing key model variables for decision uncertainty, to advise clinical implementations.

AB - Despite the known contributions of genes, genetic-guided pharmacotherapy has not been routinely implemented for venous thromboembolism (VTE). To examine evidence on cost-effectiveness of genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for VTE, we searched six databases, websites of four HTA agencies and citations, with independent double-reviewers in screening, data extraction, and quality rating. The ten eligible studies, all model-based, examined heterogeneous interventions and comparators. Findings varied widely; testing was cost-saving in two base-cases, cost-effective in four, not cost-effective in three, dominated in one. Of 22 model variables that changed decisions about cost-effectiveness, effectiveness/relative effectiveness of the intervention was the most frequent, albeit of poor quality. Studies consistently lacked details on the provision of interventions and comparators as well as on model development and validation. Besides improving the reporting of interventions, comparators, and methodological details, future economic evaluations should examine strategies recommended in guidelines and testing key model variables for decision uncertainty, to advise clinical implementations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107922461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41397-021-00243-7

DO - 10.1038/s41397-021-00243-7

M3 - Review article

C2 - 34131314

AN - SCOPUS:85107922461

VL - 21

SP - 625

EP - 637

JO - The pharmacogenomics journal

JF - The pharmacogenomics journal

SN - 1470-269X

IS - 6

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454