Governing insecurity: contingency planning, protection, resilience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

217 Citations (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How should we understand the politics of security today? This article addresses this question from one particular perspective, that of 'biosecurity'. It examines contemporary strategies for managing biorisks in three European states: France, Germany and the United Kingdom. We suggest that the framing of threat and response differs, even within Europe, and that one can identify three different configurations: contingency planning, protection and resilience. Each of these embodies a significantly different way of reconciling fundamental imperatives for those who would govern a liberal society today - the imperative of freedom and the imperative of security.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbern/a
Pages (from-to)230 - 254
Number of pages25
JournalECONOMY AND SOCIETY
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Governing insecurity: contingency planning, protection, resilience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this