King's College London

Research portal

Graded Exercise Therapy for Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Secondary care: a benchmarking study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abigail Smakowski, James Adamson, Tracey Turner, Trudie Chalder

Original languageEnglish
JournalDisability & Rehabilitation
DOIs
Accepted/In press22 Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information: T.C. is the author of several self-help books on chronic fatigue for which she has received royalties. T.C. (King’s College London, KCL) has received ad hoc payments for workshops carried out in long-term conditions. KCL have received payments for T.C.’s editor role in the Journal of Mental Health. T.C. acknowledges financial support from NIHR, Health Technology Assessment, Guy’s & St Thomas’ Charity, Muscle Disease UK. She has a patent background IP with a software company. The other authors have no competing interests to report. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

King's Authors

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the effectiveness of graded exercise therapy (GET) delivered to patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) in a routine, specialist clinic by measuring patient-reported outcome data collected prospectively over several timepoints alongside therapy. Benchmarking analyses were used to compare our results with those found in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Data were collected from patients, with a diagnosis of CFS/ME, who had been referred to a specialist clinical service in South London. Measures included Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire, Physical Functioning Subscale of the Short-Form Health Questionnaire, and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale. Change on each measure was calculated over time using linear mixed-model analyses. Within group effect sizes were calculated and compared with previous RCTs. Results: Fatigue scores were significantly reduced by session 4 (–5.18, 95%CIs −7.90, −2.45) and at follow-up (–4.73, 95%CIs −7.60, −1.85). Work and social adjustment and physical functioning progressively improved over the course of therapy, reaching significance at discharge and maintained at follow-up (WSAS −4.97, 95%CIs −7.97, −1.97; SF-36 10.75, 95%CIs 2.19, 19.31). Conclusions: GET is an effective treatment for CFS/ME within clinical practice. However, effect sizes were smaller in routine clinical practice than RCTs suggesting that avenues for augmentation need to be considered.Implications for rehabilitation It is important to assess whether patient reported outcomes of treatments that have been evaluated in the context of clinical trials are similar in routine clinical practice. This study shows fatigue severity, physical functioning, and work and social adjustment can significantly improve after graded exercise therapy for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome within a specialist service. Benchmarking methods showed clinical outcomes obtained smaller effect sizes than randomised controlled trials–techniques to maximise patient outcomes should be considered.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454