King's College London

Research portal

Holistic services for people with advanced disease and chronic breathlessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Lisa Jane Brighton, Sophie Miller, Morag Farquhar, Sarah Booth, Deok Hee Yi, Wei Gao, Sabrina Bajwah, William D-C Man, Irene Higginson, Matthew Maddocks

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)270-281
Number of pages12
Issue number3
Early online date29 Nov 2018
Accepted/In press22 Oct 2018
E-pub ahead of print29 Nov 2018
Published31 Mar 2019

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.


  • Holistic services for people with_BRIGHTON_Firstonline29November2018_GOLD CP (CC BY)

    Holistic_services_for_people_with_BRIGHTON_Firstonline29November2018_GOLD_CP_CC_BY_.pdf, 1.44 MB, application/pdf

    Uploaded date:20 Dec 2018


    Licence:CC BY

    This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the
    Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits
    others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any
    purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given,
    and indication of whether changes were made. See:

King's Authors


BACKGROUND: Breathlessness is a common, distressing symptom in people with advanced disease and a marker of deterioration. Holistic services that draw on integrated palliative care have been developed for this group. This systematic review aimed to examine the outcomes, experiences and therapeutic components of these services.

METHODS: Systematic review searching nine databases to June 2017 for experimental, qualitative and observational studies. Eligibility and quality were independently assessed by two authors. Data on service models, health and cost outcomes were synthesised, using meta-analyses as indicated. Data on recipient experiences were synthesised thematically and integrated at the level of interpretation and reporting.

RESULTS: From 3239 records identified, 37 articles were included representing 18 different services. Most services enrolled people with thoracic cancer, involved palliative care staff and comprised 4-6 contacts over 4-6 weeks. Commonly used interventions included breathing techniques, psychological support and relaxation techniques. Meta-analyses demonstrated reductions in Numeric Rating Scale distress due to breathlessness (n=324; mean difference (MD) -2.30, 95% CI -4.43 to -0.16, p=0.03) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression scores (n=408, MD -1.67, 95% CI -2.52 to -0.81, p<0.001) favouring the intervention. Statistically non-significant effects were observed for Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) mastery (n=259, MD 0.23, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.55, p=0.17) and HADS anxiety scores (n=552, MD -1.59, 95% CI -3.22 to 0.05, p=0.06). Patients and carers valued tailored education, self-management interventions and expert staff providing person-centred, dignified care. However, there was no observable effect on health status or quality of life, and mixed evidence around physical function.

CONCLUSION: Holistic services for chronic breathlessness can reduce distress in patients with advanced disease and may improve psychological outcomes of anxiety and depression. Therapeutic components of these services should be shared and integrated into clinical practice.


Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454